» Articles » PMID: 19364737

Degree Dependence in Rates of Transcription Factor Evolution Explains the Unusual Structure of Transcription Networks

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2009 Apr 15
PMID 19364737
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Transcription networks have an unusual structure. In both prokaryotes and eukaryotes, the number of target genes regulated by each transcription factor, its out-degree, follows a broad tailed distribution. By contrast, the number of transcription factors regulating a target gene, its in-degree, follows a much narrower distribution, which has no broad tail. We constructed a model of transcription network evolution through trans- and cis-mutations, gene duplication and deletion. The effects of these different evolutionary processes on the network structure are enough to produce an asymmetrical in- and out-degree distribution. However, the parameter values required to replicate known in- and out-degree distributions are unrealistic. We then considered variation in the rate of evolution of a gene dependent upon its position in the network. When transcription factors with many regulatory interactions are constrained to evolve more slowly than those with few interactions, the details of the in- and out-degree distributions of transcription networks can be fully reproduced over a range of plausible parameter values. The networks produced by our model depend on the relative rates of the different evolutionary processes. By determining the circumstances under which the networks with the correct degree distributions are produced, we are able to assess the relative importance of the different evolutionary processes in our model during evolution.

Citing Articles

Sexual antagonism drives the displacement of polymorphism across gene regulatory cascades.

Hill M, Reuter M, Stewart A Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1904):20190660.

PMID: 31161912 PMC: 6571454. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.0660.


Parsimonious reconstruction of network evolution.

Patro R, Sefer E, Malin J, Marcais G, Navlakha S, Kingsford C Algorithms Mol Biol. 2012; 7(1):25.

PMID: 22992218 PMC: 3492119. DOI: 10.1186/1748-7188-7-25.


The population genetics of cooperative gene regulation.

Stewart A, Seymour R, Pomiankowski A, Plotkin J BMC Evol Biol. 2012; 12:173.

PMID: 22954408 PMC: 3537746. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-12-173.


Integrating external biological knowledge in the construction of regulatory networks from time-series expression data.

Lo K, Raftery A, Dombek K, Zhu J, Schadt E, Bumgarner R BMC Syst Biol. 2012; 6:101.

PMID: 22898396 PMC: 3465231. DOI: 10.1186/1752-0509-6-101.


Predictive regulatory models in Drosophila melanogaster by integrative inference of transcriptional networks.

Marbach D, Roy S, Ay F, Meyer P, Candeias R, Kahveci T Genome Res. 2012; 22(7):1334-49.

PMID: 22456606 PMC: 3396374. DOI: 10.1101/gr.127191.111.


References
1.
Chung F, Lu L, Dewey T, Galas D . Duplication models for biological networks. J Comput Biol. 2003; 10(5):677-87. DOI: 10.1089/106652703322539024. View

2.
Yvert G, Brem R, Whittle J, Akey J, Foss E, Smith E . Trans-acting regulatory variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and the role of transcription factors. Nat Genet. 2003; 35(1):57-64. DOI: 10.1038/ng1222. View

3.
Tuch B, Li H, Johnson A . Evolution of eukaryotic transcription circuits. Science. 2008; 319(5871):1797-9. DOI: 10.1126/science.1152398. View

4.
Guelzim N, Bottani S, Bourgine P, Kepes F . Topological and causal structure of the yeast transcriptional regulatory network. Nat Genet. 2002; 31(1):60-3. DOI: 10.1038/ng873. View

5.
Barabasi A, Oltvai Z . Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization. Nat Rev Genet. 2004; 5(2):101-13. DOI: 10.1038/nrg1272. View