» Articles » PMID: 19358708

Use of Diagnostic Self-tests on Body Materials Among Internet Users in the Netherlands: Prevalence and Correlates of Use

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Apr 11
PMID 19358708
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: A range of self-tests on body materials has become available to the general public, but the extent of their use has hardly been studied. This study examined how many people use diagnostic self-tests on body materials such as blood or urine, as well as the type of tests that are used, and factors associated with their use.

Methods: Cross-sectional survey. Participants were recruited from an existing Dutch Internet panel of 12,529 persons, and information was collected by means of a structured Internet-based questionnaire. Multiple logistic regression analyses were used to assess correlates of self-test use.

Results: Response to the survey was 63%. Sixteen percent of the respondents said they had ever used at least one self-test, with a mean of 2.1 tests per self-tester. The most frequently reported self-tests were those for diabetes and cholesterol. Self-testers generally reported lower health status and had a higher BMI than non-testers. On the other hand, they were more likely to engage in health-related behaviour such as the use of dietary supplements and homeopathic medicine.

Conclusion: Self-testing proved to be relatively prevalent among Dutch Internet users. We therefore think that it is essential to develop appropriate information for consumers, health care providers and policymakers, about the pros and cons of self-testing and specific self-tests. More test-specific research is needed.

Citing Articles

Use of At-Home Medical Tests Among Older US Adults: A Nationally Representative Survey.

Rager J, Kirch M, Singer D, Solway E, Malani P, Roberts J Inquiry. 2024; 61:469580241284168.

PMID: 39311022 PMC: 11421401. DOI: 10.1177/00469580241284168.


Direct-to-consumer tests advertised online in Australia and their implications for medical overuse: systematic online review and a typology of clinical utility.

Shih P, Ding P, Carter S, Stanaway F, Horvath A, Langguth D BMJ Open. 2023; 13(12):e074205.

PMID: 38151277 PMC: 10759116. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074205.


Should Commercial Diagnostic Testing Be Stimulated or Discouraged? Analyzing Willingness-to-Pay and Market Externalities of Three Commercial Diagnostic Tests in The Netherlands.

Stadhouders N, van Vliet E, Brabers A, van Dijk W, Onstwedder S Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023; 22(2):193-207.

PMID: 38099980 PMC: 10864515. DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00846-0.


Public's Willingness to Perform COVID-19 Self-Testing During the Transition to the Endemic Phase in Malaysia - A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study.

Ng D, Bin Jamalludin M, Gan X, Ng S, Bin Mohamad Rasidin M, Felix B Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2023; 16:2505-2519.

PMID: 38024502 PMC: 10676112. DOI: 10.2147/RMHP.S439530.


Towards a decision aid for self-tests: Users' experiences in The Netherlands.

den Oudendammer W, Broerse J Health Expect. 2019; 22(5):983-992.

PMID: 31195432 PMC: 6803405. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12903.


References
1.
Wilson S, Ryan A, Greenfield S, Clifford S, Holder R, Pattison H . Self-testing for cancer: a community survey. BMC Cancer. 2008; 8:102. PMC: 2330151. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-8-102. View

2.
Ryan A, Greenfield S, Wilson S . Prevalence and determinants of the use of self-tests by members of the public: a mixed methods study. BMC Public Health. 2006; 6:193. PMC: 1562406. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-193. View

3.
Ryan A, Wilson S, Greenfield S, Clifford S, McManus R, Pattison H . Range of self-tests available to buy in the United Kingdom: an Internet survey. J Public Health (Oxf). 2006; 28(4):370-4. DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdl051. View

4.
Campbell S, Klein R . Home testing to detect human immunodeficiency virus: boon or bane?. J Clin Microbiol. 2006; 44(10):3473-6. PMC: 1594804. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01511-06. View

5.
Deutekom M, Bossuyt P . [The increased availability of self-tests for medical analyses]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2007; 151(16):901-4. View