» Articles » PMID: 19348110

Family Boundary Ambiguity and the Measurement of Family Structure: the Significance of Cohabitation

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Apr 8
PMID 19348110
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We used data from the first wave of the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health to examine family boundary ambiguity in adolescent and mother reports of family structure and found that the greater the family complexity, the more likely adolescent and mother reports of family structure were discrepant. This boundary ambiguity in reporting was most pronounced for cohabiting stepfamilies. Among mothers who reported living with a cohabiting partner, only one-third of their teenage children also reported residing in a cohabiting stepfamily. Conversely, for those adolescents who reported their family structure as a cohabiting stepfamily, just two-thirds of their mothers agreed. Levels of agreement between adolescents and mothers about residing in a two-biological-parent family, single-mother family, or married stepfamily were considerably higher. Estimates of the distribution of adolescents across family structures vary according to whether adolescent, mother, or combined reports are used. Moreover the relationship between family structure and family processes differed depending on whose reports of family structure were used, and boundary ambiguity was associated with several key family processes. Family boundary ambiguity presents an important measurement challenge for family scholars.

Citing Articles

Norwegian Biological Parents and Stepparents' Attitudes Towards Family Obligations in Middle and Old Age.

Sauter J J Fam Issues. 2024; 45(12):3009-3033.

PMID: 39416369 PMC: 11473242. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X241236563.


Stepfamily Variation in Parent-Child Relationship Quality in Later Life.

Lin I, Seltzer J J Marriage Fam. 2024; 86(3):718-737.

PMID: 39045223 PMC: 11262569. DOI: 10.1111/jomf.12946.


Conceptual causal models of socioeconomic status, family structure, family functioning and their role in public health.

Booysen F, Botha F, Wouters E BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1):191.

PMID: 33478444 PMC: 7821511. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10214-z.


Worsening Perceptions of Family Connectedness and Parent Support for Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Adolescents.

Watson R, Rose H, Doull M, Adjei J, Saewyc E J Child Fam Stud. 2019; 28(11):3121-3131.

PMID: 31649475 PMC: 6812531. DOI: 10.1007/s10826-019-01489-3.


Measuring Cohabitation in U.S. National Surveys.

Manning W, Joyner K, Hemez P, Cupka C Demography. 2019; 56(4):1195-1218.

PMID: 31209839 DOI: 10.1007/s13524-019-00796-0.


References
1.
Bumpass L, Lu H . Trends in cohabitation and implications for children s family contexts in the United States. Popul Stud (Camb). 2017; 54(1):29-41. DOI: 10.1080/713779060. View

2.
Cavanagh S, Schiller K, Riegle-Crumb C . Marital Transitions, Parenting, and Schooling: Exploring the Link Between Family-Structure History and Adolescents' Academic Status. Sociol Educ. 2010; 79(4):329-354. PMC: 2845478. DOI: 10.1177/003804070607900403. View

3.
Bumpass L, Sweet J . National estimates of cohabitation. Demography. 1989; 26(4):615-25. View

4.
Casper L, Cohen P . How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation. Demography. 2000; 37(2):237-45. View

5.
London R . Trends in single mothers' living arrangements from 1970 to 1995: correcting the current population survey. Demography. 1998; 35(1):125-31. View