» Articles » PMID: 19340877

Finite Element Simulation of Cement-bone Interface Micromechanics: a Comparison to Experimental Results

Overview
Journal J Orthop Res
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 Apr 3
PMID 19340877
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recently, experiments were performed to determine the micromechanical behavior of the cement-bone interface under tension-compression loading conditions. These experiments were simulated using finite element analysis (FEA) to test whether the micromechanical response of the interface could be captured in micromodels. Models were created of experimental specimens based upon microcomputed tomography data, including the complex interdigitated bone-cement morphology and simulated frictional contact at the interface. The models were subjected to a fully reversed tension-compression load, mimicking the experimental protocol. Similar to what was found experimentally, the simulated interface was stiffer in compression than in tension, and the majority of displacement was localized to the cement-bone interface. A weak correlation was found between the FEA-predicted stiffness and the stiffness found experimentally, with average errors of 8 and 30% in tension and compression, respectively. The hysteresis behavior found experimentally was partially reproduced in the simulation by including friction at the cement-bone interface. Furthermore, stress analysis suggested that cement was more at risk of fatigue failure than bone, concurring with the experimental observation that more cracks were formed in the cement than in the bone. The current study provides information that may help explain the load transfer mechanisms taking place at the cement-bone interface.

Citing Articles

Effect of bone cement augmentation with different configurations of the dual locking plate for femoral allograft fixation: finite element analysis and biomechanical study.

Wisanuyotin T, Paholpak P, Sirichativapee W, Sirichativapee W, Kosuwon W J Orthop Surg Res. 2023; 18(1):405.

PMID: 37270556 PMC: 10239087. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-023-03894-3.


Biomechanical Evaluation of Spinal Column after Percutaneous Cement Discoplasty: A Finite Element Analysis.

Li S, Xu B, Liu Y, Zhang J, Xu G, Shao P Orthop Surg. 2022; 14(8):1853-1863.

PMID: 35818350 PMC: 9363717. DOI: 10.1111/os.13314.


Laser-Induced Microgrooves Improve the Mechanical Responses of Cemented Implant Systems.

Khandaker M, Ait Moussa A, Sama D, Safavinia F, Hazra S, Kalay O Micromachines (Basel). 2020; 11(5).

PMID: 32365464 PMC: 7281130. DOI: 10.3390/mi11050466.


Finite Element Analysis of porously punched prosthetic short stem virtually designed for simulative uncemented Hip Arthroplasty.

Jian-Qiao Peng M, Chen H, Hu Y, Ju X, Bai B BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017; 18(1):295.

PMID: 28693543 PMC: 5504632. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-017-1651-9.


Biomechanical effects of morphological variations of the cortical wall at the bone-cement interface.

Zhang C, Shen G, Zhu K, Liu D J Orthop Surg Res. 2016; 11(1):72.

PMID: 27369636 PMC: 4929745. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-016-0405-y.


References
1.
Mann K, Bartel D, Wright T, Ingraffea A . Mechanical characteristics of the stem-cement interface. J Orthop Res. 1991; 9(6):798-808. DOI: 10.1002/jor.1100090605. View

2.
Perez M, Grasa J, Garcia-Aznar J, Bea J, Doblare M . Probabilistic analysis of the influence of the bonding degree of the stem-cement interface in the performance of cemented hip prostheses. J Biomech. 2005; 39(10):1859-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.05.025. View

3.
van Rietbergen B, Weinans H, Huiskes R, Odgaard A . A new method to determine trabecular bone elastic properties and loading using micromechanical finite-element models. J Biomech. 1995; 28(1):69-81. DOI: 10.1016/0021-9290(95)80008-5. View

4.
Krause W, Krug W, Miller J . Strength of the cement-bone interface. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1982; (163):290-9. View

5.
Yeni Y, Zelman E, Divine G, Kim D, Fyhrie D . Trabecular shear stress amplification and variability in human vertebral cancellous bone: relationship with age, gender, spine level and trabecular architecture. Bone. 2008; 42(3):591-6. PMC: 2276462. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2007.11.011. View