» Articles » PMID: 19335655

A Computerized Harm Minimization Prevention Program for Alcohol Misuse and Related Harms: Randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal Addiction
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Apr 2
PMID 19335655
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: Hazardous alcohol use is a leading cause of death among adolescents and young adults world-wide, yet few effective prevention interventions exist. This study was the first to examine a computerized harm minimization intervention to reduce alcohol misuse and related harms in adolescents.

Design: Cluster randomized controlled trial of a six-session curriculum-integrated harm minimization prevention program. The intervention was delivered by computer in the form of a teenage drama, which provided education through alcohol-related scenarios to which young people could relate.

Setting: Schools in Australia.

Participants: A total of 1466 year 8 students (13 years) from 16 high schools in Australia were allocated randomly to a computerized prevention program (n = 611, eight schools) or usual classes (n = 855, eight schools).

Measurements: Change in knowledge, alcohol use, alcohol-related harms and alcohol expectancies.

Findings: A computerized prevention program was more effective than usual classes in increasing alcohol-related knowledge of facts that would inform safer drinking choices and decreasing the positive social expectations which students believed alcohol may afford. For females it was effective in decreasing average alcohol consumption, alcohol-related harms and the frequency of drinking to excess (more than four standard drinks; 10 g ethanol). For males the behavioural effects were not significant.

Conclusions: A harm minimization approach is effective in educating young people about alcohol-related risks and is effective in reducing risky drinking and harms among girls. Reduction of problems among boys remains a challenge.

Citing Articles

Do school-based prevention programs impact co-occurring alcohol use and psychological distress during adolescence?.

Halladay J, Sunderland M, Newton N, Lynch S, Chapman C, Stapinski L Psychol Med. 2024; :1-11.

PMID: 39710506 PMC: 11779555. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291724002897.


Process evaluation of the digital Health4Life intervention among a sample of disadvantaged adolescents and teachers.

Egan L, Gardner L, Newton N, Champion K Health Promot Int. 2024; 39(6).

PMID: 39612512 PMC: 11606168. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daae170.


Neuroscience-informed classification of prevention interventions in substance use disorders: An RDoC-based approach.

Rezapour T, Rafei P, Baldacchino A, Conrod P, Dom G, Fishbein D Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2024; 159:105578.

PMID: 38360332 PMC: 11081014. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105578.


Potential and limitations of ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence in medical safety education.

Wang X, Liu X World J Clin Cases. 2023; 11(32):7935-7939.

PMID: 38073698 PMC: 10698415. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7935.


Delivering substance use prevention interventions for adolescents in educational settings: A scoping review.

Liu X, Guo Y, Wang X World J Psychiatry. 2023; 13(7):409-422.

PMID: 37547731 PMC: 10401500. DOI: 10.5498/wjp.v13.i7.409.