» Articles » PMID: 19332318

Commentary: Physical Approaches for the Treatment of Epilepsy: Electrical and Magnetic Stimulation and Cooling

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Apr 1
PMID 19332318
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Physical approaches for the treatment of epilepsy currently under study or development include electrical or magnetic brain stimulators and cooling devices, each of which may be implanted or applied externally. Some devices may stimulate peripheral structures, whereas others may be implanted directly into the brain. Stimulation may be delivered chronically, intermittently, or in response to either manual activation or computer-based detection of events of interest. Physical approaches may therefore ultimately be appropriate for seizure prophylaxis by causing a modification of the underlying substrate, presumably with a reduction in the intrinsic excitability of cerebral structures, or for seizure termination, by interfering with the spontaneous discharge of pathological neuronal networks. Clinical trials of device-based therapies are difficult due to ethical issues surrounding device implantation, problems with blinding, potential carryover effects that may occur in crossover designs if substrate modification occurs, and subject heterogeneity. Unresolved issues in the development of physical treatments include optimization of stimulation parameters, identification of the optimal volume of brain to be stimulated, development of adequate power supplies to stimulate the necessary areas, and a determination that stimulation itself does not promote epileptogenesis or adverse long-term effects on normal brain function.

Citing Articles

Evidence-Based Guidelines and Secondary Meta-Analysis for the Use of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Neurological and Psychiatric Disorders.

Fregni F, El-Hagrassy M, Pacheco-Barrios K, Carvalho S, Leite J, Simis M Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020; 24(4):256-313.

PMID: 32710772 PMC: 8059493. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa051.


Transcranial Alternating Current Stimulation: A Potential Risk for Genetic Generalized Epilepsy Patients (Study Case).

San-Juan D, Sarmiento C, Hernandez-Ruiz A, Elizondo-Zepeda E, Santos-Vazquez G, Reyes-Acevedo G Front Neurol. 2016; 7:213.

PMID: 27965623 PMC: 5124785. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2016.00213.


Dissociation of motor task-induced cortical excitability and pain perception changes in healthy volunteers.

Volz M, Mendonca M, Pinheiro F, Cui H, Santana M, Fregni F PLoS One. 2012; 7(3):e34273.

PMID: 22470548 PMC: 3314609. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034273.

References
1.
Karkar K, Garcia P, Bateman L, Smyth M, Barbaro N, Berger M . Focal cooling suppresses spontaneous epileptiform activity without changing the cortical motor threshold. Epilepsia. 2002; 43(8):932-5. DOI: 10.1046/j.1528-1157.2002.03902.x. View

2.
Yang X, Kennedy B, Lomber S, Schmidt R, Rothman S . Cooling produces minimal neuropathology in neocortex and hippocampus. Neurobiol Dis. 2006; 23(3):637-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.05.006. View

3.
Helmers S, Griesemer D, Dean J, Sanchez J, Labar D, Murphy J . Observations on the use of vagus nerve stimulation earlier in the course of pharmacoresistant epilepsy: patients with seizures for six years or less. Neurologist. 2003; 9(3):160-4. DOI: 10.1097/00127893-200305000-00004. View

4.
Schmitt F, Buchheim K, Meierkord H, Holtkamp M . Anticonvulsant properties of hypothermia in experimental status epilepticus. Neurobiol Dis. 2006; 23(3):689-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.nbd.2006.05.008. View

5.
Gunn A, Gunn T . The 'pharmacology' of neuronal rescue with cerebral hypothermia. Early Hum Dev. 1999; 53(1):19-35. DOI: 10.1016/s0378-3782(98)00033-4. View