» Articles » PMID: 19332184

Comparison of Ticagrelor, the First Reversible Oral P2Y(12) Receptor Antagonist, with Clopidogrel in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndromes: Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics of the PLATelet Inhibition and Patient Outcomes (PLATO) Trial

Overview
Journal Am Heart J
Date 2009 Apr 1
PMID 19332184
Citations 108
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Antiplatelet therapy is essential treatment for acute coronary syndromes (ACS). Current therapies, however, have important limitations affecting their clinical success. Ticagrelor, the first reversible oral P2Y(12) receptor antagonist, provides faster, greater, and more consistent adenosine diphosphate-receptor inhibition than clopidogrel. The phase III PLATelet inhibition and patient Outcomes (PLATO) trial is designed to test the hypothesis that ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel will result in a lower risk of recurrent thrombotic events in a broad patient population with ACS.

Methods: PLATO is an international, randomized, double-blind, event-driven trial involving >18,000 patients hospitalized for ST-elevation ACS with scheduled primary percutaneous coronary intervention or for non-ST-elevation ACS. After loading doses of ticagrelor 180 mg or clopidogrel 300 mg in a double-blind, double-dummy fashion (with provision for additional 300 mg clopidogrel at percutaneous coronary intervention), patients will receive ticagrelor 90 mg twice daily or clopidogrel 75 mg once daily for 6 to 12 months on top of acetylsalicylic acid. The primary efficacy end point is time to first occurrence of death from vascular causes, myocardial infarction, or stroke. The primary safety variable is PLATO-defined major bleeding. An extensive substudy program will explore the pathophysiology of ACS, indicators of prognosis and response to treatment, mechanisms of effect and safety of the study medications, health economics, and quality of life.

Conclusion: The PLATO study will provide a pivotal comparison of the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor with those of clopidogrel in ACS patients, together with extensive information on treatment outcomes in different subsets of ACS in a broad patient population.

Citing Articles

Antiplatelet Therapy in Low-Platelet-Count Patients After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndromes.

Paciullo F, Gresele P J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941509 PMC: 11818633. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030838.


Genotype-guided prescribing predictors in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers receiving percutaneous coronary intervention.

Park J, Cabel G, Cheng K, Dang J, Ardati A, Han J Pharmacogenomics. 2024; 25(7):293-298.

PMID: 38884958 PMC: 11404693. DOI: 10.1080/14622416.2024.2355862.


Impact of chronic thrombocytopenia on healthcare resource utilization, in-hospital outcomes, and costs following percutaneous coronary intervention of chronic total occlusion: a nationwide propensity weighted analysis.

Dodoo S, Apenteng B, Okoh A, Opoku I, Egolum U, Ghasemzadeh N Am J Cardiovasc Dis. 2024; 14(1):9-20.

PMID: 38495406 PMC: 10944354.


Comprehensive comparative efficacy and safety of potent P2Y inhibitors in patients undergoing coronary intervention: A systematic review and -analysis.

Huang C, Tsao T, Yin W, Huang W, Jen H, Lin C Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024; 51:101359.

PMID: 38371311 PMC: 10869917. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101359.


Comparison of Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elective Coronary Stenting: A Double Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Mehdizadeh Parizi M, Golchin Vafa R, Ahmadi A, Heydarzade R, Sadeghi M, Khademolhossseini A J Interv Cardiol. 2024; 2023:5544440.

PMID: 38170033 PMC: 10761231. DOI: 10.1155/2023/5544440.