» Articles » PMID: 19330389

Anatomy of the Intracortical Canal System: Scanning Electron Microscopy Study in Rabbit Femur

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2009 Mar 31
PMID 19330389
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The current model of compact bone is that of a system of longitudinal (Haversian) canals connected by transverse (Volkmann's) canals. Models based on histology or microcomputed tomography lack the morphologic detail and sense of temporal development provided by direct observation. Using direct scanning electron microscopy observation, we studied the bone surface and structure of the intracortical canal system in paired fractured surfaces in rabbit femurs, examining density of canal openings on periosteal and endosteal surfaces, internal network nodes and canal sizes, and collagen lining of the inner canal system. The blood supply of the diaphyseal compact bone entered the cortex through the canal openings on the endosteal and periosteal surfaces, with different morphologic features in the midshaft and distal shaft; their density was higher on endosteal than on periosteal surfaces in the midshaft but with no major differences among subregions. The circumference measurements along Haversian canals documented a steady reduction behind the head of the cutting cone but rather random variations as the distance from the head increased. These observations suggested discontinuous development and variable lamellar apposition rate of osteons in different segments of their trajectory. The frequent branching and types of network nodes suggested substantial osteonal plasticity and supported the model of a network organization. The collagen fibers of the canal wall were organized in intertwined, longitudinally oriented bundles with 0.1- to 0.5-mum holes connecting the canal lumen with the osteocyte canalicular system.

Citing Articles

Use of 1 mm Cerclage Cables in Surgical Treatment of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures.

Brown H, Wall B, Mears S, Stronach B, Siegel E, Stambough J Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil. 2024; 15:21514593241302655.

PMID: 39584186 PMC: 11585047. DOI: 10.1177/21514593241302655.


Osteoproductivity of Injectable Bone Grafts with and without Ostrich Eggshell Membrane Protein in Rabbit Femur.

Cengiz Z, Durmus E, Celik I, Akti A J Funct Biomater. 2024; 15(7).

PMID: 39057322 PMC: 11277672. DOI: 10.3390/jfb15070201.


Osteocyte mitochondria regulate angiogenesis of transcortical vessels.

Liao P, Chen L, Zhou H, Mei J, Chen Z, Wang B Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2529.

PMID: 38514612 PMC: 10957947. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46095-0.


Direct Assessment of Rabbit Cortical Bone Basic Multicellular Unit Longitudinal Erosion Rate: A 4D Synchrotron-Based Approach.

Harrison K, Sales E, Hiebert B, Panahifar A, Zhu N, Arnason T J Bone Miner Res. 2022; 37(11):2244-2258.

PMID: 36069373 PMC: 10091719. DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4700.


Closing cones create conical lamellae in secondary osteonal bone.

Doube M R Soc Open Sci. 2022; 9(8):220712.

PMID: 35958092 PMC: 9363998. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.220712.


References
1.
Brookes M, Lloyd E . Marrow vascularization and oestrogen-induced endosteal bone formation in mice. J Anat. 1961; 95(Pt 2):220-8. PMC: 1244466. View

2.
Stout S, BRUNSDEN B, Hildebolt C, Commean P, Smith K, TAPPEN N . Computer-assisted 3D reconstruction of serial sections of cortical bone to determine the 3D structure of osteons. Calcif Tissue Int. 1999; 65(4):280-4. DOI: 10.1007/s002239900699. View

3.
Cooper D, Thomas C, Clement J, Hallgrimsson B . Three-dimensional microcomputed tomography imaging of basic multicellular unit-related resorption spaces in human cortical bone. Anat Rec A Discov Mol Cell Evol Biol. 2006; 288(7):806-16. DOI: 10.1002/ar.a.20344. View

4.
Hert J, Fiala P, Petrtyl M . Osteon orientation of the diaphysis of the long bones in man. Bone. 1994; 15(3):269-77. DOI: 10.1016/8756-3282(94)90288-7. View

5.
Mohsin S, Taylor D, Lee T . Three-dimensional reconstruction of Haversian systems in ovine compact bone. Eur J Morphol. 2004; 40(5):309-15. DOI: 10.1076/ejom.40.5.309.28901. View