» Articles » PMID: 19320971

AKT/eNOS Signaling Module Functions As a Potential Feedback Loop in the Growth Hormone Signaling Pathway

Overview
Journal J Mol Signal
Publisher Ubiquity Press
Date 2009 Mar 27
PMID 19320971
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: While evidence suggested that the activity states of Protein kinase B (AKT/PKB) and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS) play an important role in the progression of the Growth Hormone (GH) signal cascade, the implication of the activation of AKT/PKB and eNOS in terms of their function in the signaling pathway was not clear.

Results: Using a specific AKT/PKB inhibitor and a functional proteomic approach, we were able to detect the activities of multiple signal transduction pathway elements, the downstream targets of the AKT/PKB pathway and the modification of those responses by treatment with GH. Inhibiting the AKT/PKB activity reduced or eliminated the activation (phosphorylation) of eNOS. We demonstrated that the progression of the GH signal cascade is influenced by the activity status of AKT and eNOS, wherein the suppression of AKT activity appears to augment the activity of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1 and 2 (Erk1/2) and to antagonize the deactivation (phosphorylation) of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (CDC2/Cdk1) induced by GH. Phosphorylation of GSK3a/b (glycogen synthase kinase 3), the downstream target of AKT/PKB, was inhibited by the AKT/PKB inhibitor. GH did not increase phosphorylation of ribosomal S6 kinase 1 (RSK1) in normal cells but increases phosphorylation of RSK1 in cells pre-treated with the AKT and eNOS inhibitors.

Conclusion: The MAP kinase and CDC2 kinase-dependent intracellular mechanisms are involved in or are the targets of the GH's action processes, and these activities are probably directly or indirectly modulated by AKT/PKB pathways. We propose that the AKT/PKB-eNOS module likely functions as a negative feedback mediator of GH actions.

Citing Articles

Integrating 16S rRNA Sequencing, Microflora Metabolism, and Network Pharmacology to Investigate the Mechanism of SBL in Alleviating HDM-Induced Allergic Rhinitis.

Li P, Hon S, Tsang M, Kan L, Lai A, Chan B Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201342 PMC: 11354307. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168655.


Opioids and Vitamin C: Known Interactions and Potential for Redox-Signaling Crosstalk.

Newman M, Connery H, Boyd J Antioxidants (Basel). 2022; 11(7).

PMID: 35883757 PMC: 9312198. DOI: 10.3390/antiox11071267.


ALKBH5 Regulates SPHK1-Dependent Endothelial Cell Angiogenesis Following Ischemic Stress.

Kumari R, Dutta R, Ranjan P, Suleiman Z, Goswami S, Li J Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022; 8:817304.

PMID: 35127873 PMC: 8811170. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.817304.


GWAS of three molecular traits highlights core genes and pathways alongside a highly polygenic background.

Sinnott-Armstrong N, Naqvi S, Rivas M, Pritchard J Elife. 2021; 10.

PMID: 33587031 PMC: 7884075. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.58615.


Targeting the phosphoinositide-3-kinase/protein kinase B pathway in airway innate immunity.

Gopallawa I, Lee R World J Biol Chem. 2020; 11(2):30-51.

PMID: 33024516 PMC: 7520643. DOI: 10.4331/wjbc.v11.i2.30.


References
1.
Dimmeler S, Fleming I, Fisslthaler B, Hermann C, Busse R, Zeiher A . Activation of nitric oxide synthase in endothelial cells by Akt-dependent phosphorylation. Nature. 1999; 399(6736):601-5. DOI: 10.1038/21224. View

2.
Jope R, Johnson G . The glamour and gloom of glycogen synthase kinase-3. Trends Biochem Sci. 2004; 29(2):95-102. DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2003.12.004. View

3.
Bassermann F, Peschel C, Duyster J . Mitotic entry: a matter of oscillating destruction. Cell Cycle. 2005; 4(11):1515-7. DOI: 10.4161/cc.4.11.2192. View

4.
Waters M, Hoang H, Fairlie D, Pelekanos R, Brown R . New insights into growth hormone action. J Mol Endocrinol. 2006; 36(1):1-7. DOI: 10.1677/jme.1.01933. View

5.
Waxman D . Growth hormone pulse-activated STAT5 signalling: a unique regulatory mechanism governing sexual dimorphism of liver gene expression. Novartis Found Symp. 2000; 227:61-74; discussion 75-81. DOI: 10.1002/0470870796.ch5. View