» Articles » PMID: 19319897

Controlled Experimental Study Depicting Moving Objects in View-shared Time-resolved 3D MRA

Overview
Journal Magn Reson Med
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Mar 26
PMID 19319897
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Various methods have been used for time-resolved contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA), many involving view sharing. However, the extent to which the resultant image time series represents the actual dynamic behavior of the contrast bolus is not always clear. Although numerical simulations can be used to estimate performance, an experimental study can allow more realistic characterization. The purpose of this work was to use a computer-controlled motion phantom for study of the temporal fidelity of three-dimensional (3D) time-resolved sequences in depicting a contrast bolus. It is hypothesized that the view order of the acquisition and the selection of views in the reconstruction can affect the positional accuracy and sharpness of the leading edge of the bolus and artifactual signal preceding the edge. Phantom studies were performed using dilute gadolinium-filled vials that were moved along tabletop tracks by a computer-controlled motor. Several view orders were tested using view-sharing and Cartesian sampling. Compactness of measuring the k-space center, consistency of view ordering within each reconstruction frame, and sampling the k-space center near the end of the temporal footprint were shown to be important in accurate portrayal of the leading edge of the bolus. A number of findings were confirmed in an in vivo CE-MRA study.

Citing Articles

Accelerated noncontrast-enhanced 4-dimensional intracranial MR angiography using golden-angle stack-of-stars trajectory and compressed sensing with magnitude subtraction.

Zhou Z, Han F, Yu S, Yu D, Rapacchi S, Song H Magn Reson Med. 2017; 79(2):867-878.

PMID: 28480537 PMC: 5675831. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26747.


Novel High Spatiotemporal Resolution Versus Standard-of-Care Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI: Comparison of Image Quality.

Morrison C, Bancroft L, DeMartini W, Holmes J, Wang K, Bosca R Invest Radiol. 2016; 52(4):198-205.

PMID: 27898602 PMC: 5339074. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000329.


Recent advances in 3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography.

Riederer S, Haider C, Borisch E, Weavers P, Young P J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42(1):3-22.

PMID: 26032598 PMC: 4478169. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24880.


Use of a computer-controlled motion phantom to investigate the temporal and spatial fidelity of HYPR processing.

Keith L, Rahimi M, Holmes J, Brittain J, Korosec F Magn Reson Med. 2013; 71(2):702-10.

PMID: 23475821 PMC: 4107196. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.24707.


Prospective comparison of cartesian acquisition with projection-like reconstruction magnetic resonance angiography with computed tomography angiography for evaluation of below-the-knee runoff.

Young P, Mostardi P, Glockner J, Vrtiska T, Macedo T, Haider C J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013; 24(3):392-9.

PMID: 23433414 PMC: 3593305. DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.11.005.


References
1.
Madhuranthakam A, Kruger D, Riederer S, Glockner J, Hu H . Time-resolved 3D contrast-enhanced MRA of an extended FOV using continuous table motion. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 51(3):568-76. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10729. View

2.
Parrish T, Hu X . Continuous update with random encoding (CURE): a new strategy for dynamic imaging. Magn Reson Med. 1995; 33(3):326-36. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910330307. View

3.
Wang Y, Lee H, Khilnani N, Trost D, Jagust M, Winchester P . Bolus-chase MR digital subtraction angiography in the lower extremity. Radiology. 1998; 207(1):263-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.207.1.9530326. View

4.
Riederer S, Tasciyan T, Farzaneh F, Lee J, Wright R, Herfkens R . MR fluoroscopy: technical feasibility. Magn Reson Med. 1988; 8(1):1-15. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1910080102. View

5.
Taschner C, Gieseke J, Le Thuc V, Rachdi H, Reyns N, Gauvrit J . Intracranial arteriovenous malformation: time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography with combination of parallel imaging, keyhole acquisition, and k-space sampling techniques at 1.5 T. Radiology. 2008; 246(3):871-9. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2463070293. View