Influence of Subjective Social Status on the Relationship Between Positive Outcome Expectations and Experimentation with Cigarettes

Overview

Journal J Adolesc Health

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Pediatrics

Date 2009 Mar 25

PMID 19306792

Citations 18

Authors

Anna V Wilkinson

Sanjay Shete

Vandita Vasudevan

Alexander V Prokhorov

Melissa L Bondy

Margaret R Spitz

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: In Texas, Mexican American (MA) adolescents, and in particular boys, are at increased risk for experimenting with cigarettes compared with their black or white counterparts. Positive outcome expectations (POE), that is, the functional social significance ascribed to cigarettes, and subjective social status (SSS), that is, the adolescents' subjective views of where they lie in the school-based social hierarchy, are independent predictors of smoking. The goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that SSS moderates the relationship between POE and experimentation with cigarettes.

Methods: Moderating effects of SSS were examined using a between-subjects, 2 x 2 analysis of variance and unconditional logistic regression analyses. Using a prospective study design, we followed 1142 MA adolescents aged 11-13 years. Participants completed a baseline survey at home, which assessed POE, SSS, and smoking and were followed via telephone at 6-month intervals over a 12-month period to assess changes in smoking behavior.

Results: At follow-up, there were 99 new experimenters. Consistent with our hypothesis, adolescents who reported moderate-low SSS and who held POE at baseline were more likely to have experimented with cigarettes at either follow-up evaluation than their peers with moderate-low SSS who held less POE (odds ratio [OR], 1.92, 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.02-3.58). There was no association between outcome expectations and experimenting among adolescents with high SSS (OR, 1.79, CI, .73-4.36). Low SSS boys were more likely to experiment than girls and high SSS boys.

Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that adolescents with moderate-low SSS hold different outcome expectations about smoking than their higher SSS peers. The results underscore the possibility that moderate-low SSS adolescents view behaviors such as smoking as a way to achieve higher SSS and thereby increase their peer social standing. Our results suggest that, in addition to tailoring intervention efforts by gender, placing adolescents of similar social standing to one another within the school into intervention groups that are led by a peer-nominated peer may increase the overall effectiveness of these peer-led prevention efforts.

Citing Articles

Interactive effects of financial strain and distress tolerance on prequit tobacco withdrawal symptoms in smokers preparing to initiate a quit attempt.

Bello M, Pang R, Colby S, Cassidy R, Zvolensky M, Langdon K Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2023; 31(4):805-816.

PMID: 36649154 PMC: 10349897. DOI: 10.1037/pha0000639.

Emotional symptoms and sensation seeking: Implications for tobacco interventions for youth and young adults.

Bataineh B, Wilkinson A, Case K, Clendennen S, Sumbe A, Chen B Tob Prev Cessat. 2021; 7:37.

PMID: 34046534 PMC: 8138947. DOI: 10.18332/tpc/133571.

Subjective Social Status and Cardiometabolic Risk Markers by Intersectionality of Race/Ethnicity and Sex Among U.S. Young Adults.

McClain A, Gallo L, Mattei J Ann Behav Med. 2021; 56(5):442-460.

PMID: 33942845 PMC: 9116590. DOI: 10.1093/abm/kaab025.

Associations Between Peer Use, Costs and Benefits, Self-Efficacy, and Adolescent E-cigarette Use.

Durkin K, Williford D, Turiano N, Blank M, Enlow P, Murray P J Pediatr Psychol. 2020; 46(1):112-122.

PMID: 33120416 PMC: 8456300. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsaa097.

The visibility of smoking in Europe and its relationship with youth's positive beliefs about smoking.

Lagerweij N, Kuipers M, Schreuders M, Grard A, Mlinaric M, Richter M Int J Public Health. 2019; 64(9):1335-1344.

PMID: 31486855 PMC: 6868106. DOI: 10.1007/s00038-019-01288-z.

References

Olds R, Thombs D, Tomasek J . Relations between normative beliefs and initiation intentions toward cigarette, alcohol and marijuana. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37(1):75. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.09.020. View

Rosenstock I . Why people use health services. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966; 44(3):Suppl:94-127. View

Pechacek T, Murray D, Luepker R, Mittelmark M, Johnson C, Shutz J . Measurement of adolescent smoking behavior: rationale and methods. J Behav Med. 1984; 7(1):123-40. DOI: 10.1007/BF00845351. View

Maggi S, Hertzman C, Vaillancourt T . Changes in smoking behaviors from late childhood to adolescence: insights from the Canadian National Longitudinal Survey of Children and Youth. Health Psychol. 2007; 26(2):232-40. DOI: 10.1037/0278-6133.26.2.232. View

Mayhew K, Flay B, Mott J . Stages in the development of adolescent smoking. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2000; 59 Suppl 1:S61-81. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-8716(99)00165-9. View

Mellanby A, Rees J, Tripp J . Peer-led and adult-led school health education: a critical review of available comparative research. Health Educ Res. 2001; 15(5):533-45. DOI: 10.1093/her/15.5.533. View

Goodman E, Adler N, Kawachi I, Frazier A, Huang B, Colditz G . Adolescents' perceptions of social status: development and evaluation of a new indicator. Pediatrics. 2001; 108(2):E31. DOI: 10.1542/peds.108.2.e31. View

Audrey S, Holliday J, Campbell R . It's good to talk: adolescent perspectives of an informal, peer-led intervention to reduce smoking. Soc Sci Med. 2006; 63(2):320-34. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.12.010. View

Kraemer H, Stice E, Kazdin A, Offord D, Kupfer D . How do risk factors work together? Mediators, moderators, and independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. Am J Psychiatry. 2001; 158(6):848-56. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.158.6.848. View

10.

Mokdad A, Marks J, Stroup D, Gerberding J . Actual causes of death in the United States, 2000. JAMA. 2004; 291(10):1238-45. DOI: 10.1001/jama.291.10.1238. View

11.

Alexander C, Piazza M, Mekos D, Valente T . Peers, schools, and adolescent cigarette smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2001; 29(1):22-30. DOI: 10.1016/s1054-139x(01)00210-5. View

12.

Dalton M, Sargent J, Beach M, Bernhardt A, Stevens M . Positive and negative outcome expectations of smoking: implications for prevention. Prev Med. 1999; 29(6 Pt 1):460-5. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0582. View

13.

Silva M, Rivera I, Carvalho A, Guerra Jr A, Moreira T . The prevalence of and variables associated with smoking in children and adolescents. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2006; 82(5):365-70. DOI: 10.2223/JPED.1525. View

14.

Tyas S, Pederson L . Psychosocial factors related to adolescent smoking: a critical review of the literature. Tob Control. 1999; 7(4):409-20. PMC: 1751465. DOI: 10.1136/tc.7.4.409. View

15.

Wilkinson A, Spitz M, Strom S, Prokhorov A, Barcenas C, Cao Y . Effects of nativity, age at migration, and acculturation on smoking among adult Houston residents of Mexican descent. Am J Public Health. 2005; 95(6):1043-9. PMC: 1449306. DOI: 10.2105/AJPH.2004.055319. View

16.

Mucha L, Stephenson J, Morandi N, Dirani R . Meta-analysis of disease risk associated with smoking, by gender and intensity of smoking. Gend Med. 2007; 3(4):279-91. DOI: 10.1016/s1550-8579(06)80216-0. View

17.

Finkelstein D, Kubzansky L, Goodman E . Social status, stress, and adolescent smoking. J Adolesc Health. 2006; 39(5):678-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2006.04.011. View

18.

Valente T, Unger J, Johnson C . Do popular students smoke? The association between popularity and smoking among middle school students. J Adolesc Health. 2005; 37(4):323-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2004.10.016. View

19.

Baron R, Kenny D . The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1986; 51(6):1173-82. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.51.6.1173. View

20.

Rosenstock I, Strecher V, BECKER M . Social learning theory and the Health Belief Model. Health Educ Q. 1988; 15(2):175-83. DOI: 10.1177/109019818801500203. View