» Articles » PMID: 1930636

Distance-constraint Approach to Higher-order Structures of Globular Proteins with Empirically Determined Distances Between Amino Acid Residues

Overview
Journal J Protein Chem
Specialties Biochemistry
Chemistry
Date 1991 Apr 1
PMID 1930636
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An analysis of higher-order structures of globular proteins by means of a distance-constraint approach is presented. Conformations are generated for each of 21 test proteins of small and medium sizes by optimizing an objective function f = sigma sigma wij(dij - (dij]2, where dij is a distance between residues i and j in a calculated conformation, (dij) is an assigned distance to the (ij) pair of residues which is determined based on the statistics of known three-dimensional structures of 14 proteins in the earlier study, and wij is a weighting factor. (dij) involves information about hydrophobicity and hydrophilicity of each amino acid residue and about connectivity of a polypeptide chain. In these calculations, only the amino acid sequence is used as input data specific to a calculated protein. With respect to higher-order structures regenerated in the optimized conformations, the following properties are analyzed: (a) N14 of a residue, defined as the number of residues surrounding the residue located within a sphere of radius of 14 A; (b) root-mean-square differences of the global and local conformations from the corresponding X-ray conformations; (c) distance profiles in the short and medium ranges; and (d) distance maps. The effects of supplementary information about locations of secondary structures and disulfide bonds are also examined to discuss the potential ability of this methodology to predict the three-dimensional structures of globular proteins.

Citing Articles

Relationship between protein structure and geometrical constraints.

Lund O, Hansen J, Brunak S, Bohr J Protein Sci. 1996; 5(11):2217-25.

PMID: 8931140 PMC: 2143282. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560051108.

References
1.
KYTE J, Doolittle R . A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. J Mol Biol. 1982; 157(1):105-32. DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90515-0. View

2.
Greer J . Model structure for the inflammatory protein C5a. Science. 1985; 228(4703):1055-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.3992245. View

3.
Chothia C, Lesk A, Levitt M, Amit A, Mariuzza R, Phillips S . The predicted structure of immunoglobulin D1.3 and its comparison with the crystal structure. Science. 1986; 233(4765):755-8. DOI: 10.1126/science.3090684. View

4.
Kikuchi T, NEMETHY G, Scheraga H . Prediction of the location of structural domains in globular proteins. J Protein Chem. 1988; 7(4):427-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF01024890. View

5.
Bernstein F, Koetzle T, Williams G, Meyer Jr E, Brice M, Rodgers J . The Protein Data Bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol. 1977; 112(3):535-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2836(77)80200-3. View