» Articles » PMID: 19305995

Incidental Head and Neck (18)F-FDG Uptake on PET/CT Without Corresponding Morphological Lesion: Early Predictor of Cancer Development?

Overview
Date 2009 Mar 24
PMID 19305995
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To retrospectively determine whether increased/asymmetric FDG uptake on PET without a correlating morphological lesion on fully diagnostic CT indicates the development of a head and neck malignancy.

Methods: In 590 patients (mean age 55.4 +/- 13.3 years) without a head and neck malignancy/inflammation FDG uptake was measured at (a) Waldeyer's ring, (b) the oral floor, (c) the larynx, and (d) the thyroid gland, and rated as absent (group A), present (group B), symmetric (group B1) or asymmetric (group B2). Differences between groups A and B and between B1 and B2 were tested for significance with the U-test (p < 0.05). An average follow-up of about 2.5 years (mean 29.5 +/- 13.9 months) served as the reference period to determine whether patients developed a head and neck malignancy.

Results: Of the 590 patients, 235 (40%) showed no evidence of enhanced FDG uptake in any investigated site, and 355 (60%) showed qualitatively elevated FDG uptake in at least one site. FDG uptake values (SUV(max), mean+/-SD) for Waldeyer's ring were 3.0 +/- 0.89 in group A (n = 326), 4.5 +/- 2.18 in group B (n = 264; p < 0.01), 5.4 +/- 3.35 in group B1 (n = 177), and 4.1 +/- 1.7 in group B2 (n = 87; p < 0.01). Values for the oral floor were 2.8 +/- 0.74 in group A (n = 362), 4.7 +/- 2.55 in group B (n = 228; p < 0.01), 4.4 +/- 3.39 in group B1 (n = 130), and 5.1 +/- 2.69 in group B2 (n = 98, p = 0.01). Values for the larynx were 2.8 +/- 0.76 in group A (n = 353), 4.2 +/- 2.05 in group B (n = 237; p < 0.01), 4.0 +/- 2.02 in group B1 (n = 165), and 4.6 +/- 2.8 in group B2 (n = 72; p = 0.027). Values for the thyroid were 2.4 +/- 0.63 in group A (n = 404), 3.0 +/- 1.01 in group B (n = 186; p < 0.01), 2.6 +/- 0.39 in group B1 (n = 130), and 4.0 +/- 1.24 in group B2 (n = 56; p < 0.01). One patient developed a palatine tonsil carcinoma (group B1, SUV(max) 3.2), and one patient developed an oral floor carcinoma (group B1, SUV(max) 3.7).

Conclusion: Elevated/asymmetric head and neck FDG accumulation without a correlating morphological lesion can frequently be found and does not predict cancer development. In populations in which goitre is endemic, FDG uptake by the thyroid is common and not associated with thyroid cancer.

Citing Articles

Focal Nasopharyngeal Activity Detected on [F]FDG PET/CT: Clinical Implications and Comparison of Metabolic Parameters for Prediction of Malignancy.

Wong W Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2022; 56(6):299-305.

PMID: 36425278 PMC: 9679055. DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00771-5.


Incidentalomas in the head & neck.

McQueen A, Al-Zuhir N, Ali T Br J Radiol. 2022; 96(1142):20220164.

PMID: 36317814 PMC: 9975523. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220164.


Carcinosarcoma of the colon with extensive and extraordinary metastases detected on F-FDG18PET/CT: A case report.

Maskrout M, Boutaggount F, Mokfi R, Ennibi G, Hnach Y, Tarchouli M Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2022; 81:104450.

PMID: 36147121 PMC: 9486715. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2022.104450.


F-FDGPET/CT incidental detection of tumor-to-tumor metastasis in patients investigated for squamous cell lung cancer.

Rais G, Ziouziou I, Wakrim S, Serhane H Radiol Case Rep. 2022; 17(5):1450-1456.

PMID: 35265239 PMC: 8899109. DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.02.022.


Synchronous p16 nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a case report and review.

Ali M, Kua H, Giddings C, Day D, McDowell L Clin Case Rep. 2021; 9(3):1350-1353.

PMID: 33768842 PMC: 7981711. DOI: 10.1002/ccr3.3765.


References
1.
Antoch G, Kuehl H, Kanja J, Lauenstein T, Schneemann H, Hauth E . Dual-modality PET/CT scanning with negative oral contrast agent to avoid artifacts: introduction and evaluation. Radiology. 2004; 230(3):879-85. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2303021287. View

2.
Stahl A, Stollfuss J, Ott K, Wieder H, Fink U, Schwaiger M . FDG PET and CT in locally advanced adenocarcinomas of the distal oesophagus. Clinical relevance of a discordant PET finding. Nuklearmedizin. 2006; 44(6):249-55. View

3.
Strauss L . Fluorine-18 deoxyglucose and false-positive results: a major problem in the diagnostics of oncological patients. Eur J Nucl Med. 1996; 23(10):1409-15. DOI: 10.1007/BF01367602. View

4.
Kubota R, Yamada S, Kubota K, Ishiwata K, Tamahashi N, Ido T . Intratumoral distribution of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose in vivo: high accumulation in macrophages and granulation tissues studied by microautoradiography. J Nucl Med. 1992; 33(11):1972-80. View

5.
Kostakoglu L, Hardoff R, Mirtcheva R, Goldsmith S . PET-CT fusion imaging in differentiating physiologic from pathologic FDG uptake. Radiographics. 2004; 24(5):1411-31. DOI: 10.1148/rg.245035725. View