» Articles » PMID: 19305685

The Impact of Implementing Managed Competition on Home Care Workers' Turnover Decisions

Overview
Journal Healthc Policy
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Mar 24
PMID 19305685
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This paper addresses the question: Did the implementation of managed competition in Ontario increase turnover in home care agencies? This question is addressed through a case study analysis of the impacts of tendering on the exiting home care labour force from three non-profit home care agencies during the period 1997 to 2001 in a mid-sized city in Ontario. These agencies provided 85% of the market share in 1996. Findings showed that 52% of the nurses and personal support workers (PSWs) left their agency over the five-year period. Analysis of the turnover data showed a temporal association between the implementation of managed competition and turnover. Additional support for the argument that the implementation of managed competition increased turnover is provided through analysis of a questionnaire sent to nurses and personal support workers who had left their agency during this period. Respondents indicated dissatisfaction with their pay, hours of work, benefits, heavy workload and lack of support from their supervisors/managers (all factors affected by the marketization of the home care sector) as reasons for leaving. Of those employed, only one-quarter remained in home care; most of those remaining were working in other healthcare fields such as hospitals and long-term care institutions. However, about one-third of employed PSWs were no longer working in the healthcare field.

Citing Articles

Commentary: Minding the Gap - Why Wage Parity Is Crucial for the Care of Older Canadians.

Kokorelias K, Sinha S Healthc Policy. 2023; 19(1):32-39.

PMID: 37695704 PMC: 10519331. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27160.


Economic Evidence for Home and Community Care Investment: The Case for Ontario Personal Support Workers' Wage Parity.

Zagrodney K, King E, Simon D, Nichol K, McKay S Healthc Policy. 2023; 19(1):23-31.

PMID: 37695703 PMC: 10519337. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2023.27161.


Does the Profit Motive Matter? COVID-19 Prevention and Management in Ontario Long-Term-Care Homes.

Pue K, Westlake D, Jansen A Can Public Policy. 2022; 47(3):421-438.

PMID: 36039354 PMC: 9400825. DOI: 10.3138/cpp.2020-151.


Exploring the Results of the Ontario Home Care Minimum Wage Change.

Olaizola A, Loertscher O, Sweetman A Healthc Policy. 2020; 16(1):95-110.

PMID: 32813642 PMC: 7435072. DOI: 10.12927/hcpol.2020.26288.


Optimization of home care nurses in Canada: A scoping review.

Ganann R, Weeres A, Lam A, Chung H, Valaitis R Health Soc Care Community. 2019; 27(5):e604-e621.

PMID: 31231890 PMC: 6851676. DOI: 10.1111/hsc.12797.


References
1.
Feldman P . Work life improvements for home care workers: impact and feasibility. Gerontologist. 1993; 33(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1093/geront/33.1.47. View

2.
Cushman M, Ellenbecker C, Wilson D, McNally M, Williams K . Home healthcare nurses--why they leave and why they stay. Caring. 2001; 20(10):62-7. View

3.
Denton M, Zeytinoglu I, Davies S, Lian J . Job stress and job dissatisfaction of home care workers in the context of health care restructuring. Int J Health Serv. 2002; 32(2):327-57. DOI: 10.2190/VYN8-6NKY-RKUM-L0XW. View

4.
Abelson J, Tedford Gold S, Woodward C, OConnor D, Hutchison B . Managing under managed community care: the experiences of clients, providers and managers in Ontario's competitive home care sector. Health Policy. 2004; 68(3):359-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.10.011. View

5.
Dawson S, Surpin R . The home health aide. Scarce resource in a competitive marketplace. Care Manag J. 2001; 2(4):226-31. View