» Articles » PMID: 19303030

Flavor-nutrient Learning is Less Rapid with Fat Than with Carbohydrate in Rats

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Flavor-nutrient learning occurs when the post-ingestive consequences of a food are associated with its flavor. As a signal of the food's energy density, flavor-nutrient associations have the potential to contribute to the regulation of meal size. While all calorie sources (fat, carbohydrate, protein, ethanol) can support flavor-nutrient learning, prior research has found that flavor-nutrient associations based on fat may require higher nutrient concentrations and more rigorous experimental protocols than are required to train carbohydrate (cho)-based associations. To further explore potential macronutrient-specific differences in flavor-nutrient learning, the present study compared the time course of acquisition of cho- and fat-based associations. Rats were trained to associate distinctive flavors with high-density (3.2 kcal/mL) and low-density (0.2 kcal/mL) orally-consumed solutions, either fat (corn oil emulsion) or carbohydrate (sucrose). For each nutrient, both within- and between-group designs were used to assess (via two-bottle preference testing) whether flavor-nutrient learning had occurred after 2, 4, or 6 training trial pairs. Rats trained with carbohydrate demonstrated preferential intake of the low-density paired flavor after only 2 training pairs; in contrast, rats trained with fat required 6 training pairs. These findings demonstrate differential rapidity of acquisition flavor-nutrient associations. The longer time course of acquisition of fat-based flavor-nutrient associations may be yet another mechanism by which high-fat foods promote overeating.

References
1.
Warwick Z, Synowski S, Rice K, Smart A . Independent effects of diet palatability and fat content on bout size and daily intake in rats. Physiol Behav. 2003; 80(2-3):253-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2003.07.007. View

2.
Lucas F, Sclafani A . Flavor preferences conditioned by high-fat versus high-carbohydrate diets vary as a function of session length. Physiol Behav. 1999; 66(3):389-95. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00274-1. View

3.
Lucas F, Azzara A, Sclafani A . Flavor preferences conditioned by intragastric polycose in rats: more concentrated polycose is not always more reinforcing. Physiol Behav. 1997; 63(1):7-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(97)00364-8. View

4.
Warwick Z, Synowski S, Coons V, Hendrickson A . Flavor-cued modulation of intake in rats: role of familiarity and impact on 24-h intake. Physiol Behav. 1999; 67(4):527-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0031-9384(99)00093-1. View

5.
Garcia J, KIMELDORF D, KOELLING R . Conditioned aversion to saccharin resulting from exposure to gamma radiation. Science. 1955; 122(3160):157-8. View