» Articles » PMID: 19298409

Developments in Technique and Technology: the Effect on the Results of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Staghorn Calculi

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Mar 21
PMID 19298409
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To review the development of the technique of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL), for ease of learning and development of instrumentation for staghorn calculi at our centre since 1991, and to assess the results and outcomes.

Patients And Methods: We retrospectively analysed the hospital records of 773 patients (632 males and 141 females, 834 renal units) who underwent PCNL for staghorn calculi at our centre from January 1991 to August 2008. We divided the patients into three groups depending on the changes in treatment policy, global trends and advances in equipment as follows: the first 200 cases (group I) from January 1991 to December 1996 (216 renal units); the next 200 (group II) from January 1997 to December 2001 (212 renal units); and the last 373 (group III) from January 2002 to August 2008 (406 renal units).

Results: The mean (sd, range) operative duration in groups I, II and III, respectively, were 138.2 (52.7, 60-310), 121.4 (42.8, 70-250) and 112.5 (51.5, 55-310) min; the decrease in haemoglobin level was 3.2, 2.6 and 1.6 g/dL, respectively, and continued to decrease with improvements in technique. With increasing experience, the number of stages required for stone clearance and the number of tracts required decreased exponentially. Most of the severe complications occurred early in our experience. The stone clearance rate in groups I, II and III was 81%, 86% and 93%, respectively, after completing the procedure; the overall clearance rate with observation/auxiliary procedures was 86%, 89% and 96%, respectively. The mean hospital stay for groups I, II and III was 11.1 (3.9, 7-25), 9.5 (3.4, 5-22) and 7.1 (3.6, 4-28) days, respectively.

Conclusion: The percutaneous management of staghorn calculi requires considerable expertise. Our data suggest that 'multiperc' PCNL is difficult to learn and requires experience. Although over the years our results improved, complete clearance remains a challenge. A constant review and application of newer techniques and results will improve the overall clearance rates further.

Citing Articles

A multicenter study on the application of artificial intelligence radiological characteristics to predict prognosis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy.

Hou J, Wen X, Qu G, Chen W, Xu X, Wu G Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1184608.

PMID: 37780621 PMC: 10541026. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1184608.


Can we identify the risk factors for SIRS/sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy? A meta‑analysis and literature review.

Puia D, Gheorghinca S, Radavoi G, Jinga V, Pricop C Exp Ther Med. 2023; 25(3):110.

PMID: 36793328 PMC: 9923362. DOI: 10.3892/etm.2023.11809.


Is There Still a Place for Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Current Times?.

De Lorenzis E, Zanetti S, Boeri L, Montanari E J Clin Med. 2022; 11(17).

PMID: 36079083 PMC: 9457409. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11175157.


The Influence of Aging on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Complete Staghorn Stones: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Sahan M, Yarimoglu S, Savun M, Erdemoglu O, Degirmenci T Cureus. 2022; 13(11):e20001.

PMID: 34984150 PMC: 8715892. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20001.


Single- versus Multiple-Tract Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Surgical Management of Staghorn Stones or Complex Caliceal Calculi: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Jiao B, Ding Z, Luo Z, Lai S, Xu X, Chen X Biomed Res Int. 2020; 2020:8817070.

PMID: 33381587 PMC: 7762636. DOI: 10.1155/2020/8817070.