» Articles » PMID: 19294536

Stage-specific Survival Differences Associated with Postoperative Radiotherapy for Gastrointestinal Cancers

Overview
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 Mar 19
PMID 19294536
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To study the frequency and effect associated with postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for patients with resected gastrointestinal (GI) cancers.

Materials And Methods: In observational cohort from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program, a total of 23,049 patients were identified with resected pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, or rectal carcinomas diagnosed from 1988 to 2003. Using a propensity score analysis, survival differences associated with postoperative RT were analyzed.

Results: Adjuvant RT was given to 51.2%, 26.3%, 33.0%, and 58.0% of pancreatic, gastric, esophageal, and rectal cancer patients, respectively. Age and stage of disease were associated with RT use for each site (P < 0.001), with younger patients and those with advanced disease receiving RT more frequently. Postoperative RT was associated with a survival benefit for patients with pancreatic cancer (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.96), gastric cancer (HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.87-0.99), and rectal cancer (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.90). Subgroups of patients were also identified who experienced the greatest improvement in survival with RT (stage IIB pancreatic cancer, HR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.62-0.80]; stage IIIA and IV gastric cancer, HR = 0.86 [95% CI 0.77-0.97] and HR = 0.77 [95% CI 0.67-0.89], respectively; stages IIA, IIIB, and IIIC rectal cancer, HR = 0.87 [95% CI 0.78-0.97], HR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.63-0.80], and HR = 0.79 [95% CI 0.70-0.90], respectively).

Conclusion: Postoperative RT is associated with improved survival for patients who undergo curative resection of pancreatic, gastric, and rectal malignancies. Significant differences are observed for this effect according to stage of disease, with more advanced cases in general experiencing a greater benefit with RT.

Citing Articles

The importance of a multidisciplinary team in rectal cancer management.

Bochis O, Fekete Z, Vlad C, Fetica B, Leucuta D, Busuioc C Clujul Med. 2017; 90(3):279-285.

PMID: 28781524 PMC: 5536207. DOI: 10.15386/cjmed-689.


Interval between Surgery and Radiation Therapy Is an Important Prognostic Factor in Treatment of Rectal Cancer.

Kim J, Byun S, Park S, Oh Y, Baek S Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 44(3):187-94.

PMID: 23091445 PMC: 3467422. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2012.44.3.187.

References
1.
Crane C, Ben-Josef E, Small Jr W . Chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(26):2713-5. View

2.
Moody J, Sawrie S, Kozak K, Plastaras J, Howard G, Bonner J . Adjuvant radiotherapy for pancreatic cancer is associated with a survival benefit primarily in stage IIB patients. J Gastroenterol. 2009; 44(1):84-91. DOI: 10.1007/s00535-008-2280-8. View

3.
Burmeister B, Smithers B, Gebski V, Fitzgerald L, Simes R, Devitt P . Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2005; 6(9):659-68. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(05)70288-6. View

4.
Neoptolemos J, Stocken D, Friess H, Bassi C, Dunn J, Hickey H . A randomized trial of chemoradiotherapy and chemotherapy after resection of pancreatic cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(12):1200-10. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa032295. View

5.
Dumont P, Wihlm J, Roeslin N, Massard G, Lion R, Morand G . [Result of surgery of esophageal cancer. Analysis of a series of 349 cases based on resection methods]. Ann Chir. 1993; 47(8):773-83. View