» Articles » PMID: 19275852

Laparoscopic-assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy for Uteri Weighing 1000 Grams or More

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2009 Mar 12
PMID 19275852
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Prospective randomized trials have proven the benefits of laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) compared with abdominal hysterectomy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of LAVH performed for uteri weighing > or =1000 grams.

Methods: Fifteen patients underwent attempted LAVH for uteri >1000g. Median age was 45 years old (range, 31 to 57), and median weight was 170 pounds (range, 130 to 236); 64% had medical comorbidities, and 43% had prior pelvic surgery. Five ports (5 mm) were used to allow maximum uterine manipulation. Uterine vessels were doubly coagulated.

Results: Fourteen of 15 cases (93%) were successfully completed laparoscopically. Median uterine weight was 1090 grams (range, 1000 to 1650). Median operative time was 3.5 hours (range, 2 to 4.6), and median blood loss was 400 mL (range, 100 to 1200). All patients were discharged on postoperative day one, and no patients developed a postoperative complication.

Conclusion: We believe that LAVH is a safe and effective approach for uteri larger than 1000 g. It is our opinion that 3 surgical techniques are required; maximum Trendelenburg position, adequate number of ports, and double coagulations of the uterine vessels.

Citing Articles

Comparison of Robotic and Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for the Large Uterus.

Sinha R, Bana R, Sanjay M JSLS. 2019; 23(1).

PMID: 30675091 PMC: 6328360. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00068.


Laparoscopic removal of a very large uterus weighting 5320 g is feasible and safe: a case report.

Maccio A, Kotsonis P, Lavra F, Chiappe G, Sanna D, Zamboni F BMC Surg. 2017; 17(1):50.

PMID: 28472966 PMC: 5418735. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-017-0248-4.


Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy in Patients with Large Uteri: Comparison of Uterine Removal by Transvaginal and Uterine Morcellation Approaches.

Wang H, Li P, Li X, Gao L, Lu C, Zhao J Biomed Res Int. 2016; 2016:8784601.

PMID: 27419141 PMC: 4933852. DOI: 10.1155/2016/8784601.


A Prospective, double-blinded randomized controlled study comparing two different Trendelenburg tilts in laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy positioning.

Mallick S, Das A, Dutta S, Chattopadhyay S, Das T, Banu R J Nat Sci Biol Med. 2015; 6(1):153-8.

PMID: 25810654 PMC: 4367028. DOI: 10.4103/0976-9668.149115.


Minimally invasive hysterectomy at a university teaching hospital.

Mitri M, Fanning J, Davies M, Kesterson J, Ural S, Kunselman A JSLS. 2014; 18(3).

PMID: 25392620 PMC: 4154410. DOI: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00231.


References
1.
Salmanli N, Maher P . Laparoscopically-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for fibroid uteri weighing at least 500 grammes. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 39(2):182-4. DOI: 10.1111/j.1479-828x.1999.tb03367.x. View

2.
Pelosi M, Kadar N . Laparoscopically assisted hysterectomy for uteri weighing 500 g or more. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 1994; 1(4 Pt 1):405-9. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)80808-4. View

3.
Mittapalli R, Fanning J, Flora R, Fenton B . Cost-effectiveness analysis of the treatment of large leiomyomas: laparoscopic assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus abdominal hysterectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196(5):e19-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.12.029. View

4.
Wang C, Yuen L, Yen C, Lee C, Soong Y . A simplified method to decrease operative blood loss in laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy for the large uterus. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc. 2004; 11(3):370-3. DOI: 10.1016/s1074-3804(05)60053-9. View

5.
Fishman B, Pasternak S, WALLENSTEIN S, HOUDE R, Holland J, Foley K . The Memorial Pain Assessment Card. A valid instrument for the evaluation of cancer pain. Cancer. 1987; 60(5):1151-8. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19870901)60:5<1151::aid-cncr2820600538>3.0.co;2-g. View