» Articles » PMID: 19275851

Open Laparoscopic Access Technique: Review of 2010 Patients

Overview
Journal JSLS
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2009 Mar 12
PMID 19275851
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: We assessed safety and efficacy of an open laparoscopic entry technique.

Methods: A retrospective review of all patients undergoing laparoscopy via open laparoscopic access over an 8-year period from January 1, 1998 to December 31, 2006 is presented.

Results: During the study period, 2010 consecutive subjects underwent laparoscopy. Recorded intraoperative complications include enterotomy (0.1%) and failure to enter (0.1%). There were no instances of vascular injury related to entry. Recorded postoperative complications include hernia (0.9%), infection (2.5%), hematoma (0.05%), and noncosmetic healing (0.4%). A statistically significant association existed between obesity and postoperative hernia, and between previous abdominal surgery and postoperative infection.

Conclusion: Though typically straightforward, initial entry is one of the most common causes of injury in laparoscopy. The predominant entry method of entry in gynecologic surgery remains a closed technique. This technique has unfortunately been demonstrated in multiple series to have the potential for visceral and vascular injury due to its blind insertion of Veress needles and trocars. The open laparoscopic technique is a safe and effective method of obtaining access to the abdominal cavity with no associated vascular injury.

Citing Articles

Comparison of two entry methods for laparoscopic port entry: technical point of view.

Toro A, Mannino M, Cappello G, Di Stefano A, Di Carlo I Diagn Ther Endosc. 2012; 2012:305428.

PMID: 22761542 PMC: 3384909. DOI: 10.1155/2012/305428.


A safe quick technique for placement of the first access port for creation of pneumoperitoneum.

Sangrasi A, Memon A, Memon M, Abbasi M, Laghari A, Qureshi J JSLS. 2012; 15(4):504-8.

PMID: 22643506 PMC: 3340960. DOI: 10.4293/108680811X13176785204238.


Laparoscopic entry: a review of Canadian general surgical practice.

Compeau C, McLeod N, Ternamian A Can J Surg. 2011; 54(5):315-20.

PMID: 21774882 PMC: 3195650. DOI: 10.1503/cjs.011210.

References
1.
Zaraca F, Catarci M, Gossetti F, Mulieri G, Carboni M . Routine use of open laparoscopy: 1,006 consecutive cases. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999; 9(1):75-80. DOI: 10.1089/lap.1999.9.75. View

2.
Penfield A . How to prevent complications of open laparoscopy. J Reprod Med. 1985; 30(9):660-3. View

3.
Sigman H, Fried G, Garzon J, HINCHEY E, Wexler M, Meakins J . Risks of blind versus open approach to celiotomy for laparoscopic surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1993; 3(4):296-9. View

4.
Molloy D, Kaloo P, Cooper M, Nguyen T . Laparoscopic entry: a literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002; 42(3):246-54. DOI: 10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x. View

5.
Wallace D, ODwyer P . Clinical experience with open laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998; 7(5):285-8. DOI: 10.1089/lap.1997.7.285. View