» Articles » PMID: 19266634

Assessing the Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Cost-effectiveness of Assistive Technology Interventions for Enhancing Mobility

Overview
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Date 2009 Mar 7
PMID 19266634
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to highlight the contributions that complementary efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness studies can make to assessing the outcomes of assistive technology interventions for enhancing mobility.

Method: The terms, 'assistive technology outcomes research' and 'assistive technology interventions', are defined. Several bases are examined for the shortage of outcomes research pertaining to mobility-related assistive technology interventions. Three presuppositions are described for the research strategy of interlocking studies being recommended. They are assigning priority to evaluating both recently developed assistive technologies and ones that have long been available, acknowledging the complexity of assistive technology as an intervention, and appreciating the trade-offs necessary for strengthening studies' internal and external validity. Some key study preparations are considered, including treatment theory, treatment specification, and the selection of outcome domains and measures. The essential features of efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness studies are outlined, and their interdependence is stressed.

Results And Conclusions: To assess the outcomes of assistive technology interventions for mobility in ways that are both methodologically sound and relevant to stakeholder needs, a research strategy is required involving mutually reinforcing efficacy, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness studies. Collaborative arrangements and funding methods are discussed for fostering the needed research.

Citing Articles

Available Assistive Technology Outcome Measures: Systematic Review.

Borgnis F, Desideri L, Converti R, Salatino C JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023; 10:e51124.

PMID: 37782310 PMC: 10687703. DOI: 10.2196/51124.


How Loan Bank of Assistive Technology Impacts on Life of Persons with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis and Neuromuscular Diseases: A Collaborative Initiative.

Pousada T, Garabal-Barbeira J, Martinez C, Groba B, Nieto-Riveiro L, Pereira J Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(2).

PMID: 33477437 PMC: 7830315. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18020763.


Evaluating the Effect of Functional Electrical Stimulation Used for Foot Drop on Aspects of Health-Related Quality of Life in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review.

Miller Renfrew L, Lord A, Warren J, Hunter R Int J MS Care. 2019; 21(4):173-182.

PMID: 31474810 PMC: 6709571. DOI: 10.7224/1537-2073.2018-015.


How a diverse research ecosystem has generated new rehabilitation technologies: Review of NIDILRR's Rehabilitation Engineering Research Centers.

Reinkensmeyer D, Blackstone S, Bodine C, Brabyn J, Brienza D, Caves K J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2017; 14(1):109.

PMID: 29110728 PMC: 5674748. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0321-3.


A research-based strategy for managing housing adaptations: study protocol for a quasi-experimental trial.

Ekstam L, Carlsson G, Chiatti C, Nilsson M, Malmgren Fange A BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:602.

PMID: 25432718 PMC: 4256922. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-014-0602-5.