» Articles » PMID: 19264411

Characteristics and Methodological Quality of 25 Years of Research Investigating Psychosocial Interventions for Cancer Patients

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Oncology
Date 2009 Mar 7
PMID 19264411
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The considerable amount of research examining psychosocial interventions for cancer patients makes it important to examine its scope and methodological quality. This comprehensive overview characterizes the field with as few exclusions as possible. A systematic search strategy identified 673 reports comprising 488 unique projects conducted over a 25 year time span. Although the literature on this topic has grown over time, the research was predominantly conducted in the United States (57.0%), largely with breast cancer patients (included in 70.5% of the studies). The intervention approach used most frequently was cognitive behavioral (32.4%), the treatment goal was often improving quality of life generally (69.5%), and the professionals delivering the interventions were typically nurses (29.1%) or psychologists (22.7%). Overall, there was some discrepancy between the types of interventions studied and the types of supportive services available to and sought by cancer patients. Strengths of this research include using randomized designs (62.9%), testing for baseline group equivalence (84.5%), and monitoring treatment, which rose significantly from being used in 48.1-64.4% of projects over time. However, deficiencies in such areas as examining treatment mechanisms and the adequacy of reporting of methodology, essential for useful syntheses of research on these interventions, remain to be addressed. Methodological challenges related to the complexity of this applied research, such as participants seeking treatment outside of research, contamination, and reactions to randomization, also were apparent. Future research could benefit from closer interactions between academic and voluntary sectors and expanding the diversity of participants.

Citing Articles

The effect of YOCAS©® yoga on cancer-related fatigue and quality of life in older (60+) vs. younger (≤ 59) cancer survivors: Secondary analysis of a nationwide, multicenter, phase 3 randomized controlled trial.

Arana-Chicas E, Lin P, Gada U, Sun H, Chakrabarti A, Mattick L J Geriatr Oncol. 2024; 15(8):102076.

PMID: 39368335 PMC: 11822854. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.102076.


Telehealth-Based Music Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Anxiety in Cancer Survivors: Rationale and Protocol for a Comparative Effectiveness Trial.

Liou K, McConnell K, Currier M, Baser R, MacLeod J, Walker D JMIR Res Protoc. 2023; 12:e46281.

PMID: 37103999 PMC: 10176150. DOI: 10.2196/46281.


Effects of Integrated Chinese Traditional Medicine and Conventional Western Medicine on the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Bai X, Ta N, Gong G, Zhang B, Wei C Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2022; 2022:3123878.

PMID: 35035500 PMC: 8759913. DOI: 10.1155/2022/3123878.


Mindfulness-Based Interventions in Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review of Participants' Adherence to Home Practice.

Baydoun M, Moran C, McLennan A, Piedalue K, Oberoi D, Carlson L Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021; 15:1225-1242.

PMID: 34135575 PMC: 8200136. DOI: 10.2147/PPA.S267064.


Unmet need for mental health services in indolent lymphoma: age differences over one-year post-diagnosis.

Trevino K, Martin P, Saracino R, Leonard J Leuk Lymphoma. 2021; 62(6):1370-1378.

PMID: 34082646 PMC: 8188610. DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2021.1872071.


References
1.
Dodd M . Efficacy of proactive information on self-care in chemotherapy patients. Patient Educ Couns. 1988; 11(3):215-25. DOI: 10.1016/0738-3991(88)90021-3. View

2.
Gilbar O, Neuman R . Which cancer patient completes a psychosocial intervention program?. Psychooncology. 2002; 11(6):461-71. DOI: 10.1002/pon.608. View

3.
Nezu A, Nezu C, Felgoise S, McClure K, Houts P . Project Genesis: assessing the efficacy of problem-solving therapy for distressed adult cancer patients. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003; 71(6):1036-48. DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.71.6.1036. View

4.
Gottlieb B, Wachala E . Cancer support groups: a critical review of empirical studies. Psychooncology. 2006; 16(5):379-400. DOI: 10.1002/pon.1078. View

5.
Lieberman M, Golant M, Giese-Davis J, Winzlenberg A, Benjamin H, Humphreys K . Electronic support groups for breast carcinoma: a clinical trial of effectiveness. Cancer. 2003; 97(4):920-5. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.11145. View