Digitization of Simulated Clinical Dental Impressions: Virtual Three-dimensional Analysis of Exactness
Overview
Affiliations
Objectives: To compare the exactness of simulated clinical impressions and stone replicas of crown preparations, using digitization and virtual three-dimensional analysis.
Methods: Three master dies (mandibular incisor, canine and molar) were prepared for full crowns, mounted in full dental arches in a plane line articulator. Eight impressions were taken using an experimental monophase vinyl polysiloxane-based material. Stone replicas were poured in type IV stone (Vel-Mix Stone; Kerr). The master dies and the stone replicas were digitized in a touch-probe scanner (Procera) Forte; Nobel Biocare AB) and the impressions in a laser scanner (D250, 3Shape A/S), to create virtual models. The resulting point-clouds from the digitization of the master dies were used as CAD-Reference-Models (CRM). Discrepancies between the points in the pointclouds and the corresponding CRM were measured by a matching-software (CopyCAD 6.504 SP2; Delcam Plc). The distribution of the discrepancies was analyzed and depicted on color-difference maps.
Results: The discrepancies of the digitized impressions and the stone replicas compared to the CRM were of similar size with a mean+/-SD within 40microm, with the exception of two of the digitized molar impressions. The precision of the digitized impressions and stone replicas did not differ significantly (F=4.2; p=0.053). However, the shape affected the digitization (F=5.4; p=0.013) and the interaction effect of shape and digitization source (impression or stone replica) was pronounced (F=28; p<0.0001). The reliability was high for both digitization methods, evaluated by repeated digitizations.
Significance: The exactness of the digitized impressions varied with shape. Both impressions and stone replicas can be digitized repeatedly with a high reliability.
Shen Y, Gong Z, Wang J, Fang S Heliyon. 2024; 10(22):e40477.
PMID: 39634413 PMC: 11616597. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40477.
Popa A, Vladutu D, Turcu A, Tartea D, Ionescu M, Paunescu C Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(13).
PMID: 39001349 PMC: 11241177. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131457.
Giuliodori G, Rappelli G, Aquilanti L Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(6).
PMID: 36981684 PMC: 10048864. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20064776.
Evaluating the accuracy of CAD/CAM optimized stones compared to conventional type IV stones.
Ceylan G, Emir F PLoS One. 2023; 18(3):e0282509.
PMID: 36877717 PMC: 9987827. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282509.
The efficacy of computed tomography scanning versus surface scanning in 3D finite element analysis.
Rowe A, Rayfield E PeerJ. 2022; 10:e13760.
PMID: 36042861 PMC: 9420411. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.13760.