» Articles » PMID: 19259717

Predicting Optimal CPAP by Neural Network Reduces Titration Failure: a Randomized Study

Overview
Journal Sleep Breath
Publisher Springer
Date 2009 Mar 5
PMID 19259717
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the standard therapy for obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. In the absence of standard protocol, CPAP titration may be unsuccessful. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that application of an artificial neural network (ANN) to CPAP titration would achieve an optimal CPAP pressure within a shorter time interval and would lead to a decrease in CPAP titration failure.

Methods: One hundred fifteen patients were randomized 1:1 to either conventional CPAP titration (n = 58) or to an ANN-guided CPAP titration (n = 57). Both groups were assessed for time to optimal CPAP pressure, for titration failure, and for CPAP compliance therapy.

Results: Patients in the ANN-guided CPAP titration arm were able to achieve optimal CPAP at a shorter time interval compared to the conventional group (198.7 +/- 143.8 min versus 284.0 +/- 126.5 min) (p < 0.001). There was also a lower titration failure in patients randomized to the ANN-guided CPAP titration arm (16%) compared to the conventional arm (36%) (p = 0.02). Compliance with treatment did not differ across the two arms.

Conclusions: The use of ANN for guiding CPAP titration may be superior to the conventional method in maximizing the time to achieve optimal CPAP and in reducing CPAP titration failure.

Citing Articles

Randomized Clinical Trials of Machine Learning Interventions in Health Care: A Systematic Review.

Plana D, Shung D, Grimshaw A, Saraf A, Sung J, Kann B JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5(9):e2233946.

PMID: 36173632 PMC: 9523495. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.33946.


Randomized Controlled Trials of Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Practice: Systematic Review.

Lam T, Cheung M, Munro Y, Lim K, Shung D, Sung J J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(8):e37188.

PMID: 35904087 PMC: 9459941. DOI: 10.2196/37188.


Barriers of artificial intelligence implementation in the diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.

Brennan H, Kirby S J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022; 51(1):16.

PMID: 35468865 PMC: 9036782. DOI: 10.1186/s40463-022-00566-w.


Development and validation pathways of artificial intelligence tools evaluated in randomised clinical trials.

Siontis G, Sweda R, Noseworthy P, Friedman P, Siontis K, Patel C BMJ Health Care Inform. 2021; 28(1).

PMID: 34969668 PMC: 8718483. DOI: 10.1136/bmjhci-2021-100466.


Mathematical Equations to Predict Positive Airway Pressures for Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review.

Camacho M, Riaz M, Tahoori A, Certal V, Kushida C Sleep Disord. 2015; 2015:293868.

PMID: 26294977 PMC: 4534631. DOI: 10.1155/2015/293868.

References
1.
Weaver T, Grunstein R . Adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy: the challenge to effective treatment. Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2008; 5(2):173-8. PMC: 2645251. DOI: 10.1513/pats.200708-119MG. View

2.
Jenkinson C, Davies R, Mullins R, Stradling J . Comparison of therapeutic and subtherapeutic nasal continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea: a randomised prospective parallel trial. Lancet. 1999; 353(9170):2100-5. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10532-9. View

3.
Jean Wiese H, Boethel C, Phillips B, Wilson J, Peters J, Viggiano T . CPAP compliance: video education may help!. Sleep Med. 2005; 6(2):171-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.sleep.2004.08.006. View

4.
Dernaika T, Tawk M, Nazir S, Younis W, Kinasewitz G . The significance and outcome of continuous positive airway pressure-related central sleep apnea during split-night sleep studies. Chest. 2007; 132(1):81-7. DOI: 10.1378/chest.06-2562. View

5.
Lloberes P, Rodriguez B, Roca A, Sagales M, de la Calzada M, Gimenez S . Comparison of conventional nighttime with automatic or manual daytime CPAP titration in unselected sleep apnea patients: study of the usefulness of daytime titration studies. Respir Med. 2004; 98(7):619-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.12.014. View