Online Focus Groups As a Tool to Collect Data in Hard-to-include Populations: Examples from Paediatric Oncology

Overview

Journal BMC Med Res Methodol

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialties General Medicine
Health Services

Date 2009 Mar 5

PMID 19257883

Citations 86

Authors

Kiek Tates

Marieke Zwaanswijk

Roel Otten

Sandra van Dulmen

Peter M Hoogerbrugge

Willem A Kamps

Jozien M Bensing

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this article is to describe and evaluate the methodology of online focus group discussions within the setting of paediatric oncology.

Methods: Qualitative study consisting of separate moderated asynchronous online discussion groups with 7 paediatric cancer patients (aged 8-17), 11 parents, and 18 survivors of childhood cancer (aged 8-17 at diagnosis).

Results: All three participant groups could be actively engaged over a one-week period. Respondents highly valued the flexibility and convenience of logging in at their own time and place to join the discussion. Adolescent patients and survivors emphasized that the anonymity experienced made them feel comfortable to express their views in detail. The findings indicate a strong preference for online group discussions across all participant groups.

Conclusion: The findings show that online focus group methodology is a feasible tool for collecting qualitative data within the setting of paediatric oncology, and may offer new opportunities to collect data in other hard-to-include populations. The evaluations seem to indicate that the online group discussions have given participants an opportunity to articulate their experiences and views in a way they might not have done in a traditional group discussion.

Citing Articles

Perceived barriers and facilitators to HPV vaccination: Insights from focus groups with unvaccinated mid-adults in a U.S. medically underserved area.

Krishna S, Polonijo A Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2024; 20(1):2422681.

PMID: 39539025 PMC: 11572185. DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2422681.

Reflections on timing of motherhood - a qualitative online study with women of reproductive age.

Temmesen C, Nielsen H, Birch Petersen K, Clemensen J BMC Womens Health. 2024; 24(1):589.

PMID: 39501239 PMC: 11536869. DOI: 10.1186/s12905-024-03409-0.

Addressing Child and Adolescent Mental Health Problems in the Community. Evaluation of a Consultation and Advise Team for Assessment, Support and Referral.

Hoogsteder M, Vandenbussche S, Zwaanswijk M Int J Integr Care. 2024; 24(4):5.

PMID: 39464383 PMC: 11505133. DOI: 10.5334/ijic.8584.

Through the Zoom window: How children use virtual technologies to navigate power dynamics in research.

Fechtel H, Ruiz S, Spray J, Waters E, Shepperd J, Hunleth J Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2024; 27(5):575-588.

PMID: 39345844 PMC: 11433603. DOI: 10.1080/13645579.2023.2231756.

Towards reducing diagnostic delay in endometriosis in primary care: a qualitative study.

de Kok L, Schers H, Boersen Z, Braat D, Teunissen D, Nap A BJGP Open. 2024; 8(3).

PMID: 38621791 PMC: 11523507. DOI: 10.3399/BJGPO.2024.0019.

References

Birnbaum M . Human research and data collection via the internet. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004; 55:803-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141601. View

Kenny A . Interaction in cyberspace: an online focus group. J Adv Nurs. 2005; 49(4):414-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03305.x. View

Elwyn G, Edwards A, Gwyn R, Grol R . Towards a feasible model for shared decision making: focus group study with general practice registrars. BMJ. 1999; 319(7212):753-6. PMC: 28229. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7212.753. View

Zwaanswijk M, Tates K, van Dulmen S, Hoogerbrugge P, Kamps W, Bensing J . Young patients', parents', and survivors' communication preferences in paediatric oncology: results of online focus groups. BMC Pediatr. 2007; 7:35. PMC: 2206018. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-7-35. View

Bowling J, Rimer B, Lyons E, Golin C, Frydman G, Ribisl K . Methodologic challenges of e-health research. Eval Program Plann. 2007; 29(4):390-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.08.011. View

Gray N, Klein J, Noyce P, Sesselberg T, Cantrill J . Health information-seeking behaviour in adolescence: the place of the internet. Soc Sci Med. 2005; 60(7):1467-78. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2004.08.010. View

Ahern N . Using the Internet to conduct research. Nurse Res. 2006; 13(2):55-70. DOI: 10.7748/nr2005.10.13.2.55.c5968. View

Freeman K, ODell C, Meola C . Focus group methodology for patients, parents, and siblings. J Pediatr Oncol Nurs. 2001; 18(6):276-86. DOI: 10.1053/jpon.2001.28455. View

Walston J, Lissitz R . Computer-mediated focus groups. Eval Rev. 2001; 24(5):457-83. DOI: 10.1177/0193841X0002400502. View

10.

Adler C, Zarchin Y . The "virtual focus group": using the Internet to reach pregnant women on home bed rest. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2002; 31(4):418-27. DOI: 10.1111/j.1552-6909.2002.tb00064.x. View

11.

Eysenbach G, Wyatt J . Using the Internet for surveys and health research. J Med Internet Res. 2003; 4(2):E13. PMC: 1761932. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.4.2.e13. View

12.

Guise J, Widdicombe S, McKinlay A . 'What is it like to have ME?': the discursive construction of ME in computer-mediated communication and face-to-face interaction. Health (London). 2006; 11(1):87-108. DOI: 10.1177/1363459307070806. View

13.

Duffy M . Methodological issues in Web-based research. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2002; 34(1):83-8. DOI: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2002.00083.x. View

14.

Powell R, Single H . Focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 1996; 8(5):499-504. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/8.5.499. View

15.

Peterson-Sweeney K . The use of focus groups in pediatric and adolescent research. J Pediatr Health Care. 2005; 19(2):104-10. DOI: 10.1016/j.pedhc.2004.08.006. View

16.

Heary C, Hennessy E . The use of focus group interviews in pediatric health care research. J Pediatr Psychol. 2001; 27(1):47-57. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/27.1.47. View

17.

Shrank W, Kutner J, Richardson T, Mularski R, Fischer S, Kagawa-Singer M . Focus group findings about the influence of culture on communication preferences in end-of-life care. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(8):703-9. PMC: 1490193. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0151.x. View

18.

Kennedy C, Charlesworth A, Chen J . Interactive data collection: benefits of integrating new media into pediatric research. Comput Inform Nurs. 2003; 21(3):120-7. DOI: 10.1097/00024665-200305000-00007. View

19.

Kitzinger J . Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995; 311(7000):299-302. PMC: 2550365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299. View

20.

van der Wouden J, Blankenstein A, Huibers M, van der Windt D, Stalman W, Verhagen A . Survey among 78 studies showed that Lasagna's law holds in Dutch primary care research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007; 60(8):819-24. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.11.010. View