» Articles » PMID: 19251901

DNA As an Adhesin: Bacillus Cereus Requires Extracellular DNA to Form Biofilms

Overview
Date 2009 Mar 3
PMID 19251901
Citations 103
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The soil saprophyte Bacillus cereus forms biofilms at solid-liquid interfaces. The composition of the extracellular polymeric matrix is not known, but biofilms of other bacteria are encased in polysaccharides, protein, and also extracellular DNA (eDNA). A Tn917 screen for strains impaired in biofilm formation at a solid-liquid interface yielded several mutants. Three mutants deficient in the purine biosynthesis genes purA, purC, and purL were biofilm impaired, but they grew planktonically like the wild type in Luria-Bertani broth. Biofilm populations had higher purA, purC, and purL transcript ratios than planktonic cultures, as measured by real-time PCR. Laser scanning confocal microscopy (LSCM) of BacLight-stained samples indicated that there were nucleic acids in the cell-associated matrix. This eDNA could be mobilized off the biofilm into an agarose gel matrix through electrophoresis, and it was a substrate for DNase. Glass surfaces exposed to exponentially growing populations acquired a DNA-containing conditioning film, as indicated by LSCM. Planktonic exponential-phase cells released DNA into an agarose gel matrix through electrophoresis, while stationary-phase populations did not do this. DNase treatment of planktonic exponential-phase populations rendered cells more susceptible than control populations to the DNA-interacting antibiotic actinomycin D. Exponential-phase purA cells did not contain detectable eDNA, nor did they convey a DNA-containing conditioning film to the glass surface. These results indicate that exponential-phase cells of B. cereus ATCC 14579 are decorated with eDNA and that biofilm formation requires DNA as part of the extracellular polymeric matrix.

Citing Articles

Universal receptive system as a novel regulator of transcriptomic activity of Staphylococcus aureus.

Tetz G, Kardava K, Vecherkovskaya M, Khodadadi-Jamayran A, Tsirigos A, Tetz V Microb Cell Fact. 2025; 24(1):1.

PMID: 39754239 PMC: 11697845. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-024-02637-1.


Proteomics and EPS Compositional Analysis Reveals SY-1 Induced Corrosion on Q235 Steel by Biofilm Formation.

Wang Y, Zhang R, Mathivanan K, Zhang Y, Yang L, Guan F Materials (Basel). 2024; 17(20).

PMID: 39459765 PMC: 11509735. DOI: 10.3390/ma17205060.


Differences in Biofilm Formation of and Their Effects on Virulence and Drug Resistance of Different Strains.

Yang Y, Kong X, Niu B, Yang J, Chen Q Foods. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 38611380 PMC: 11011679. DOI: 10.3390/foods13071076.


Investigating the Role of OrbF in Biofilm Biosynthesis and Regulation of Biofilm-Associated Genes in BC1.

Sun Y, Shuai W, Nie L, Li X, Jiang L Foods. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38472751 PMC: 10931033. DOI: 10.3390/foods13050638.


Extracellular matrix-degrading enzymes as a biofilm control strategy for food-related microorganisms.

Kim J, Lim M, Kim S, Lee J Food Sci Biotechnol. 2023; 32(12):1745-1761.

PMID: 37780595 PMC: 10533455. DOI: 10.1007/s10068-023-01373-3.


References
1.
Mah T, OToole G . Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents. Trends Microbiol. 2001; 9(1):34-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2. View

2.
Vilain S, Cosette P, Zimmerlin I, Dupont J, Junter G, Jouenne T . Biofilm proteome: homogeneity or versatility?. J Proteome Res. 2004; 3(1):132-6. DOI: 10.1021/pr034044t. View

3.
Webb J, Thompson L, James S, Charlton T, Tolker-Nielsen T, Koch B . Cell death in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm development. J Bacteriol. 2003; 185(15):4585-92. PMC: 165772. DOI: 10.1128/JB.185.15.4585-4592.2003. View

4.
Steinmoen H, Knutsen E, Havarstein L . Induction of natural competence in Streptococcus pneumoniae triggers lysis and DNA release from a subfraction of the cell population. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002; 99(11):7681-6. PMC: 124321. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.112464599. View

5.
Costerton J, Geesey G, Cheng K . How bacteria stick. Sci Am. 1978; 238(1):86-95. DOI: 10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86. View