» Articles » PMID: 19248127

A Quality Indicator Set for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Overview
Journal Arthritis Rheum
Specialty Rheumatology
Date 2009 Feb 28
PMID 19248127
Citations 65
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To systematically develop a quality indicator (QI) set for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Methods: We used a validated process that combined available scientific evidence and expert consensus to develop a QI set for SLE. We extracted 20 candidate indicators from a systematic literature review of clinical practice guidelines pertaining to SLE. An advisory panel revised and augmented these candidate indicators and, through 2 rounds of voting, arrived at 25 QIs. These QIs advanced to the next phase of the project, in which we employed a modification of the RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method. A systematic review of the literature was performed for each QI, linking the proposed process of care to potential improved health outcomes. After reviewing this scientific evidence, a second interdisciplinary expert panel convened to discuss the evidence and provide final ratings on the validity and feasibility of each QI.

Results: The final expert panel rated 20 QIs as both valid and feasible. Areas covered included diagnosis, general preventive strategies (e.g., vaccinations, sun avoidance counseling, and screening for cardiovascular disease), osteoporosis prevention and treatment, drug toxicity monitoring, renal disease, and reproductive health.

Conclusion: We employed a rigorous multistep approach with systematic literature reviews and 2 expert panels to develop QIs for SLE. This new set of indicators provides an opportunity to assess health care quality in patients with SLE and represents an initial step toward the important goal of improving care in this patient population.

Citing Articles

Increasing Contraception Documentation in an Academic Rheumatology Clinic: A Quality Improvement Approach.

Siegel C, Jannat-Khah D, Mikhaylov A, Fritz P, Abramson E, Sammaritano L ACR Open Rheumatol. 2025; 7(1):e11775.

PMID: 39846210 PMC: 11755063. DOI: 10.1002/acr2.11775.


Experiences of sexual and reproductive health screening and counseling in the clinical setting among adolescents and young adults with rheumatic disease.

Huynh B, Ott M, Tarvin S Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2025; 23(1):5.

PMID: 39833874 PMC: 11749332. DOI: 10.1186/s12969-025-01056-9.


Quality Measures in Systemic Sclerosis.

Aboabat A, Ahmad Z, Steiman A, Johnson S Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36832067 PMC: 9955321. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040579.


A survey of systemic lupus erythematosus patients' attitudes toward influenza and pneumococcal vaccination in Southwest China.

Chen Y, Chen B, Shen X, Zhou A, Liang Y, Wang Y Front Public Health. 2023; 10:1018899.

PMID: 36605245 PMC: 9807807. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1018899.


Teratogenic medication use associated with favourable odds of contraception counselling in a cohort of women with systemic lupus erythematosus at a large tertiary academic medical centre.

Chandramouli S, Alvarez C, Englund T, Silverstein R, Sheikh S Lupus Sci Med. 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 36418076 PMC: 9685263. DOI: 10.1136/lupus-2022-000823.


References
1.
Brook R, McGlynn E, Shekelle P . Defining and measuring quality of care: a perspective from US researchers. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000; 12(4):281-95. DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/12.4.281. View

2.
Campbell S, Hann M, Hacker J, Durie A, Thapar A, Roland M . Quality assessment for three common conditions in primary care: validity and reliability of review criteria developed by expert panels for angina, asthma and type 2 diabetes. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002; 11(2):125-30. PMC: 1743588. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.11.2.125. View

3.
Maclean C, Saag K, Solomon D, Morton S, Sampsel S, Klippel J . Measuring quality in arthritis care: methods for developing the Arthritis Foundation's quality indicator set. Arthritis Rheum. 2004; 51(2):193-202. DOI: 10.1002/art.20248. View

4.
Odutola J, Ward M . Ethnic and socioeconomic disparities in health among patients with rheumatic disease. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2005; 17(2):147-52. DOI: 10.1097/01.bor.0000151403.18651.de. View

5.
Kravitz R, Park R, Kahan J . Measuring the clinical consistency of panelists' appropriateness ratings: the case of coronary artery bypass surgery. Health Policy. 1997; 42(2):135-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0168-8510(97)00064-x. View