» Articles » PMID: 19248004

Anatomic Relationship Between the Pubic Symphysis and Ischial Spines and Its Clinical Significance in the Assessment of Fetal Head Engagement and Station During Labor

Overview
Date 2009 Feb 28
PMID 19248004
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To develop a geometric model from computed tomographic (CT) images in non-pregnant women that would objectively reflect clinical head station in laboring patients, against which to test the accuracy of digital examinations.

Method: CT scans were performed in 70 non-pregnant women to determine, using a geometric model, which angle in a mid-sagittal transperineal ultrasound (TPU) image best coincided with the mid-point of a line drawn between the ischial spines (zero station). Using a geometric algorithm, TPU angles were then assigned for other clinical stations (-5 to + 5). Finally, clinical station was assessed by digital examination and simultaneous TPU assessments in 88 laboring patients to see how closely the clinical examination correlated with the station calculated from the above geometric model.

Results: The mean angle between the long axis of the symphysis pubis and the mid-point of the line connecting the two ischial spines for the 70 non-pregnant subjects was 99 degrees . The geometric model developed allowed us to build an algorithm to assign a specific set of theoretical angles to each computed station. Relationships between digitally assessed fetal head station, TPU angle for each station, and the geometrical model created with CT data, are reported. Clinical digital assessment of station correlated poorly with computed station, especially at stations below zero, where it could have greater clinical impact.

Conclusion: The TPU angle of 99 degrees correlated with zero station, and each station above or below this station could be assigned a specific corresponding angle for reference.

Citing Articles

Dystocia, Delivery, and Artificial Intelligence in Labor Management: Perspectives and Future Directions.

Malvasi A, Malgieri L, Stark M, Tinelli A J Clin Med. 2024; 13(21).

PMID: 39518549 PMC: 11546974. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13216410.


Artificial Intelligence, Intrapartum Ultrasound and Dystocic Delivery: AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm), a Promising Helping Decision Support System.

Malvasi A, Malgieri L, Cicinelli E, Vimercati A, Damato A, Dellino M J Imaging. 2024; 10(5).

PMID: 38786561 PMC: 11122467. DOI: 10.3390/jimaging10050107.


Accurate evaluation of the progress of delivery with transperineal ultrasound may improve vaginal delivery: a single-center retrospective study.

Enomoto N, Maki S, Nii M, Yamaguchi M, Tamaishi Y, Takakura S Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):20945.

PMID: 38016993 PMC: 10684555. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-47457-2.


The success of vaginal birth by use of trans-labial ultrasound plus vaginal examination and vaginal examination only in pregnant women with labor induction: a comparative study.

Nouri-Khasheh-Heiran E, Montazeri A, Conversano F, Kashanian M, Rasuli M, Rahimi M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):3.

PMID: 36597037 PMC: 9809008. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-022-05324-4.


Multitask Deep Neural Network for the Fully Automatic Measurement of the Angle of Progression.

Lu Y, Zhi D, Zhou M, Lai F, Chen G, Ou Z Comput Math Methods Med. 2022; 2022:5192338.

PMID: 36092792 PMC: 9462992. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5192338.