» Articles » PMID: 19247673

BaS Analysis: a New Cephalometric Study for Craniofacial Malformations

Overview
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 2009 Feb 28
PMID 19247673
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Object: Patients submitted to surgical advancement of the upper and middle facial third might have a relapse of the skeletal retraction after the removal of the distractor devices. Clinical signs related to this process are usually represented by exophthalmos, Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) or prognathism; however, the analytic definition of the relapse is very difficult , conventional cephalometric methods being influenced by the spatial movement of "N" (nasion) or "Or" (orbital) points. The authors present a new cephalometric technique that could be used as a more objective mean of follow-up evaluation of patients undergoing craniofacial advancement.

Materials And Methods: The cephalometric analysis proposed is based on angles, lines, areas and distances between BaS (Basion-Sella) axis and other craniofacial landmark points. We have defined this cephalometric technique as "BaS Analysis".

Conclusion: The "BaS analysis" is not influenced by splanchnocranium movements in the space; for this reason, it can be considered a useful method for cephalometric analysis in the follow-up of patients with craniofacial malformations.

Citing Articles

Cephalometric Evaluation of Anterior Cranial Base Slope in Patients with Skeletal Class I Malocclusion with Low or High SNA and SNB Angles.

Camci H, Salmanpour F Turk J Orthod. 2020; 33(3):171-176.

PMID: 32974063 PMC: 7491964. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2020.20017.


Imaging in craniosynostosis: when and what?.

Massimi L, Bianchi F, Frassanito P, Calandrelli R, Tamburrini G, Caldarelli M Childs Nerv Syst. 2019; 35(11):2055-2069.

PMID: 31289853 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-019-04278-x.


Corrected Cephalometric Analysis to Determine the Distance and Vector of Distraction Osteogenesis for Syndromic Craniosynostosis.

Kobayashi S, Fukawa T, Hirakawa T, Satake T, Maegawa J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017; 5(9):e1482.

PMID: 29062650 PMC: 5640355. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000001482.


External craniofacial osteodistraction in complex craniosynostoses.

Gasparini G, Di Rocco C, Tamburrini G, Pelo S Childs Nerv Syst. 2012; 28(9):1565-70.

PMID: 22872274 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-012-1820-y.


Correlations between the abnormal development of the skull base and facial skeleton growth in anterior synostotic plagiocephaly: the predictive value of a classification based on CT scan examination.

Pelo S, Tamburrini G, Marianetti T, Saponaro G, Moro A, Gasparini G Childs Nerv Syst. 2011; 27(9):1431-43.

PMID: 21720819 DOI: 10.1007/s00381-011-1514-x.

References
1.
Altobelli D, Kikinis R, Mulliken J, Cline H, Lorensen W, Jolesz F . Computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in craniofacial surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993; 92(4):576-85; discussion 586-7. View

2.
Lippold C, Danesh G, Meyer U, Hohoff A, Kelker M, Kleinheinz J . Potential and limitations of cephalometric analysis of maxillofacial bone movement in the case of LeFort III-distraction. J Orofac Orthop. 2005; 66(5):388-96. DOI: 10.1007/s00056-0510-8. View

3.
CONVERSE J, WOOD-SMITH D, McCarthy J, COCCARO P . Craniofacial surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 1974; 1(3):499-557. View

4.
Kreiborg S, ADUSS H . Pre- and postsurgical facial growth in patients with Crouzon's and Apert's syndromes. Cleft Palate J. 1986; 23 Suppl 1:78-90. View

5.
Witherow H, Thiessen F, Evans R, Jones B, Hayward R, Dunaway D . Relapse following frontofacial advancement using the rigid external distractor. J Craniofac Surg. 2008; 19(1):113-20. DOI: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31815cddc8. View