» Articles » PMID: 19247665

Bladder Tumour Staging: Comparison of Diffusion- and T2-weighted MR Imaging

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Feb 28
PMID 19247665
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of this work was to evaluate the clinical feasibility of diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI in detection and staging of urinary bladder tumour and to compare DW MRI with the T(2)-weighted technique. One hundred and six patients with bladder tumour were prospectively included in our study. All patients were evaluated with MR imaging. We started with axial T(2)-weighted high resolution MR of the urinary bladder, then DW MRI. Two radiologists independently interpreted the MR images, and discrepancies were resolved by consensus. The accuracy of DW MRI in staging of bladder tumour was evaluated using the final histopathological findings. In DW imaging (DWI) staging accuracy was 63.6% and 69.6% in differentiating superficial from invasive tumours and organ-confined from non-organ-confined tumours, respectively. On a stage by a stage basis, DWI accuracy was 63.6% (21/33), 75.7% (25/33), 93.7% (30/32) and 87.5% (7/8) for stages T1, T2, T3 and T4, respectively. In the T(2)-weighted technique, the overall staging accuracy was only 39.6% and accuracy for differentiating superficial from invasive tumours and organ-confined from non-organ-confined tumours was 6.1% and 15.1%, respectively. DW is superior to T(2)-weighted MRI in staging of organ-confined tumours (< or =T2) and both techniques are comparable in the evaluation of higher-stage tumours.

Citing Articles

Multiparametric MRI in Era of Artificial Intelligence for Bladder Cancer Therapies.

Akin O, Lema-Dopico A, Paudyal R, Konar A, Chenevert T, Malyarenko D Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(22).

PMID: 38001728 PMC: 10670574. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15225468.


Image quality evaluation of diffusion-weighted imaging in bladder cancer: a comparison between integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming and single-shot echo-planar imaging.

Wang Y, Chen S, Zhang W, Xiao W, Su J, Zhang R Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023; 13(4):2526-2537.

PMID: 37064386 PMC: 10102749. DOI: 10.21037/qims-22-851.


An MRI-based radiomics nomogram in predicting histologic grade of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Li L, Zhang J, Zhe X, Chang H, Tang M, Lei X Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1025972.

PMID: 37007156 PMC: 10060523. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1025972.


Does Bladder Cancer with Inchworm Sign Indicate Better Prognosis after TURBT?.

Nakagawa R, Izumi K, Naito R, Kadomoto S, Iwamoto H, Yaegashi H Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(23).

PMID: 36497249 PMC: 9737124. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235767.


The comparison between contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing bladder urothelial carcinoma.

Fu W, Liu D, Xiong Y, Liu C, Liu J, Yi X Int Urol Nephrol. 2022; 55(5):1073-1079.

PMID: 36422743 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-022-03410-2.


References
1.
Tanimoto A, Yuasa Y, Imai Y, Izutsu M, Hiramatsu K, Tachibana M . Bladder tumor staging: comparison of conventional and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging and CT. Radiology. 1992; 185(3):741-7. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.185.3.1438756. View

2.
Akmangit I, Lakadamyali H, Oto A, Ozen H, Akhan O, Besim A . [Staging of urinary bladder tumors with CT and MRI]. Tani Girisim Radyol. 2003; 9(1):63-9. View

3.
Barentsz J, Jager G, Witjes J, Ruijs J . Primary staging of urinary bladder carcinoma: the role of MRI and a comparison with CT. Eur Radiol. 1996; 6(2):129-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF00181125. View

4.
Sato C, Naganawa S, Nakamura T, Kumada H, Miura S, Takizawa O . Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005; 21(3):258-62. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20251. View

5.
El-Assmy A, Abou-El-Ghar M, Refaie H, El-Diasty T . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in diagnosis of superficial and invasive urinary bladder carcinoma: a preliminary prospective study. ScientificWorldJournal. 2008; 8:364-70. PMC: 5848630. DOI: 10.1100/tsw.2008.55. View