» Articles » PMID: 19241111

Evaluation of Pain Measurement Practices and Opinions of Peripheral Nerve Surgeons

Overview
Journal Hand (N Y)
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2009 Feb 26
PMID 19241111
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the opinions and practices of peripheral nerve surgeons regarding assessment and treatment of pain in patients following nerve injury. Surgeons with expertise in upper extremity peripheral nerve injuries and members of an international peripheral nerve society were sent an introductory letter and electronic survey by email (n = 133). Seventy members responded to the survey (49%) and 59 surgeons completed the survey (44%). For patients referred for motor or sensory dysfunction, 31 surgeons (52%) indicated that they always formally assess pain. In patients referred for pain, 44 surgeons (75%) quantitatively assess pain using a verbal scale (n = 24) or verbal numeric scale (n = 36). The most frequent factors considered very important in the development of chronic neuropathic pain were psychosocial factors (64%), mechanism of injury (59%), workers' compensation or litigation (54%), and iatrogenic injury (48%). In patients more than 6 months following injury, surgeons frequently see: cold sensitivity (54%), decreased motor function (42%), paraesthesia or numbness (41%), fear of returning to work (22%), neuropathic pain (20%), and emotional or psychological distress (17%). Only 52% of surgeons who responded to the survey always evaluate pain in patients referred for motor or sensory dysfunction. Pain assessment most frequently includes verbal patient response, and assessment of psychosocial factors is rarely included. Predominately, patient-related factors were considered important in the development of chronic neuropathic pain.

Citing Articles

Concepts of Pain Management Following Nerve Injuries: Multidisciplinary Approach.

Faust A, DeMartini S, Carey-Ewend A, Crock L, Buday S, Brogan D J Hand Surg Glob Online. 2024; 6(5):749-755.

PMID: 39381396 PMC: 11456641. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsg.2024.01.019.


Trends in Brachial Plexus Surgery: Characterizing Contemporary Practices for Exploration of Supraclavicular Plexus.

Hill J, Lanier S, Rolf L, James A, Brogan D, Dy C Hand (N Y). 2021; 18(1_suppl):14S-21S.

PMID: 34018448 PMC: 9896279. DOI: 10.1177/15589447211014613.


Frequency and Risk Factors for Prolonged Opioid Prescriptions After Surgery for Brachial Plexus Injury.

Dy C, Peacock K, Olsen M, Ray W, Brogan D J Hand Surg Am. 2019; 44(8):662-668.e1.

PMID: 31078338 PMC: 7193763. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2019.04.001.


Neuropathic pain in patients with upper-extremity nerve injury.

Novak C, Katz J Physiother Can. 2011; 62(3):190-201.

PMID: 21629596 PMC: 2909869. DOI: 10.3138/physio.62.3.190.

References
1.
Jaquet J, Luijsterburg A, Kalmijn S, Kuypers P, Hofman A, Hovius S . Median, ulnar, and combined median-ulnar nerve injuries: functional outcome and return to productivity. J Trauma. 2001; 51(4):687-92. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200110000-00011. View

2.
Chuang D, Lee G, Hashem F, Wei F . Restoration of shoulder abduction by nerve transfer in avulsed brachial plexus injury: evaluation of 99 patients with various nerve transfers. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1995; 96(1):122-8. DOI: 10.1097/00006534-199507000-00019. View

3.
Samii M, Ludemann W, Tatagiba M, Blomer U . Treatment of refractory pain after brachial plexus avulsion with dorsal root entry zone lesions. Neurosurgery. 2001; 48(6):1269-75; discussion 1275-7. View

4.
Chuang D, Epstein M, Yeh M, Wei F . Functional restoration of elbow flexion in brachial plexus injuries: results in 167 patients (excluding obstetric brachial plexus injury). J Hand Surg Am. 1993; 18(2):285-91. DOI: 10.1016/0363-5023(93)90363-8. View

5.
VanGeest J, Johnson T, Welch V . Methodologies for improving response rates in surveys of physicians: a systematic review. Eval Health Prof. 2007; 30(4):303-21. DOI: 10.1177/0163278707307899. View