» Articles » PMID: 19239453

Meta-analysis: Does Lidocaine Gel Before Flexible Cystoscopy Provide Pain Relief?

Overview
Journal BJU Int
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Feb 26
PMID 19239453
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To consolidate previous reports and conduct a meta-analysis to draw further conclusions on the efficacy of the instillation of lidocaine gel before flexible cystoscopy, as it has had varying efficacy in several randomized controlled studies.

Methods: We reviewed previous reports cited in PubMed, Biosis and the Cochrane Library, identified by a professional librarian searching for English language-only randomized controlled studies involving the keywords, lidocaine, cystoscopy, gel and pain, yielding 14 studies. Ten studies were excluded as they provided no comparison with appropriate control groups or contained insufficient data for analysis. Attempts to contact the authors of these studies yielded no additional data. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model.

Results: Four studies were included in the analysis, two double-blind and two single-blind, totalling 411 male patients. Three of the studies found no statistical improvement and one study found a statistically significant improvement in pain relief using lidocaine gel. Studies varied on the quantity of gel instilled and on the dwell time of gel before cystoscopy. The meta-analysis found that subjects who received anaesthetic-impregnated gel were 1.7 times more likely not to experience moderate to severe pain (<2, 3 or 30, based on the scale used; odds ratio 1.7, 95% confidence interval 1.1-2.8) than subjects who did not have intraurethral instillation of gel.

Conclusions: These data suggest that intraurethral instillation of lidocaine gel vs plain lubricating gel reduces the likelihood of moderate to severe pain during flexible cystoscopy.

Citing Articles

Efficacy and safety of office-based diode laser ablation for recurrent low-grade non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer under local anaesthesia: A pilot study.

Khalil I, Younes N, Badawi A, Rumaihi K Arab J Urol. 2025; 23(1):70-74.

PMID: 39776557 PMC: 11703422. DOI: 10.1080/20905998.2024.2381816.


Alternating Cystoscopy with Bladder EpiCheck in the Surveillance of Low-Grade Intermediate-Risk NMIBC: A Cost Comparison Model.

Lotan Y, Gakis G, Manfredi M, Morote J, Mostafid H, Porpiglia F Bladder Cancer. 2024; 7(3):307-315.

PMID: 38993615 PMC: 11181831. DOI: 10.3233/BLC-211528.


Comparing the effectiveness and lubricity of a novel Shea lubricant to 2% lidocaine gel for digital rectal examination: a randomized non-inferiority trial.

Adanu K, Iroko D, Amegan-Aho K, Adedia D, Ndudiri O, Ali M Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):4666.

PMID: 36949085 PMC: 10033511. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-31555-2.


The Function Improved of the Newly Designed Magnetic-End Ureteric Stenting Retrieval Device: A Clinical Prospective Randomized and Control Trial in a Multicenter Study.

Zeng S, Liu B, Hu H, Shi J, Qian P, Zhang X Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022; 2022:4107491.

PMID: 35517991 PMC: 9038401. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4107491.


Pain reduction methods during transurethral cystoscopy.

Laszkiewicz J, Krajewski W, Luczak M, Chorbinska J, Nowak L, Bardowska K Contemp Oncol (Pozn). 2021; 25(2):80-87.

PMID: 34667433 PMC: 8506429. DOI: 10.5114/wo.2021.106652.