» Articles » PMID: 19236718

Community-based Infant Hearing Screening in a Developing Country: Parental Uptake of Follow-up Services

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2009 Feb 25
PMID 19236718
Citations 15
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Universal newborn hearing screening is now considered an essential public health care for the early detection of disabling life-long childhood hearing impairment globally. However, like any health interventions in early childhood, parental support and participation is essential for achieving satisfactory uptake of services. This study set out to determine maternal/infant socio-demographic factors associated with follow-up compliance in community-based infant hearing screening programmes in a developing country.

Methods: After health educational/counselling sessions, infants attending routine childhood immunisation clinics at four primary care centres were enrolled into a two-stage infant hearing screening programme consisting of a first-stage screening with transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions and second-stage screening with automated auditory brainstem response. Infants referred after the second-stage screening were scheduled for diagnostic evaluation within three months. Maternal and infant factors associated with completion of the hearing screening protocol were determined with multivariable logistic regression analysis.

Results: No mother declined participation during the study period. A total of 285 out of 2,003 eligible infants were referred after the first-stage screening out of which 148 (51.9%) did not return for the second-stage, while 32 (39.0%) of the 82 infants scheduled for diagnostic evaluation defaulted. Mothers who delivered outside hospitals were significantly more likely to return for follow-up screening than those who delivered in hospitals (Odds ratio: 1.62; 95% confidence intervals: 0.98 - 2.70; p = 0.062). No other factors correlated with follow-up compliance for screening and diagnostic services.

Conclusion: Place of delivery was the only factor that correlated albeit marginally with infant hearing screening compliance in this population. The likely influence of issues such as the number of return visits for follow-up services, ineffective tracking system and the prevailing unfavourable cultural perception towards childhood deafness on non-compliance independently or through these factors warrant further investigation.

Citing Articles

Cost-effectiveness of screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Karachi, Pakistan using a universally applicable cost-effectiveness model.

Pigeolet M, Gaafar H, Naamani D, Khan M, Alkire B, Chinoy M BMJ Public Health. 2025; 2(1):e000340.

PMID: 40018184 PMC: 11812765. DOI: 10.1136/bmjph-2023-000340.


Cost-effectiveness of portable-automated ABR for universal neonatal hearing screening in India.

Sahoo K, Dwivedi R, Athe R, Chauhan A, Jain S, Sahoo R Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1364226.

PMID: 39188791 PMC: 11345169. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1364226.


Newborn and infant hearing screening for early detection of hearing loss in Nairobi, Kenya.

Ndegwa S, Tucci D, Lemons J, Murila F, Shepherd S, Mwangi M Afr Health Sci. 2024; 24(1):228-238.

PMID: 38962342 PMC: 11217834. DOI: 10.4314/ahs.v24i1.28.


Sociodemographic Factors Affecting Loss to Follow-Up After Newborn Hearing Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Atherton K, Poupore N, Clemmens C, Nietert P, Pecha P Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023; 168(6):1289-1300.

PMID: 36939626 PMC: 10773460. DOI: 10.1002/ohn.221.


Community Health Workers as Patient-Site Facilitators in Adult Hearing Aid Services via Synchronous Teleaudiology: Feasibility Results from the Conexiones Randomized Controlled Trial.

Coco L, Carvajal S, Navarro C, Piper R, Marrone N Ear Hear. 2022; 44(1):28-42.

PMID: 36253920 PMC: 9780168. DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001281.


References
1.
Olusanya B, Luxon L, Wirz S . Maternal views on infant hearing loss in a developing country. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005; 70(4):619-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.08.004. View

2.
Folsom R, Widen J, Vohr B, Cone-Wesson B, Gorga M, Sininger Y . Identification of neonatal hearing impairment: recruitment and follow-up. Ear Hear. 2000; 21(5):462-70. DOI: 10.1097/00003446-200010000-00010. View

3.
Hubley J . Patient education in the developing world--a discipline comes of age. Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 61(1):161-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2005.02.011. View

4.
Young A, Tattersall H . Universal newborn hearing screening and early identification of deafness: parents' responses to knowing early and their expectations of child communication development. J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2007; 12(2):209-20. DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl033. View

5.
Ioannidis J, Taha T, Kumwenda N, Broadhead R, Mtimavalye L, Miotti P . Predictors and impact of losses to follow-up in an HIV-1 perinatal transmission cohort in Malawi. Int J Epidemiol. 1999; 28(4):769-75. DOI: 10.1093/ije/28.4.769. View