» Articles » PMID: 19221845

"Taste Strips" - a Rapid, Lateralized, Gustatory Bedside Identification Test Based on Impregnated Filter Papers

Overview
Journal J Neurol
Specialty Neurology
Date 2009 Feb 18
PMID 19221845
Citations 180
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To elaborate normative values for a clinical psychophysical taste test ("Taste Strips").

Background: The "Taste Strips" are a psychophysical chemical taste test. So far, no definitive normative data had been published and only a fairly small sample size has been investigated. In light of this shortcoming for this easy, reliable and quick taste testing device, we attempted to provide normative values suitable for the clinical use.

Setting: Normative value acquisition study, multicenter study.

Methods: The investigation involved 537 participants reporting a normal sense of smell and taste (318 female, 219 male, mean age 44 years, age range 18-87 years). The taste test was based on spoon-shaped filter paper strips ("Taste Strips") impregnated with the four (sweet, sour, salty, and bitter) taste qualities in four different concentrations. The strips were placed on the left or right side of the anterior third of the extended tongue, resulting in a total of 32 trials. With their tongue still extended, patients had to identify the taste from a list of four descriptors, i. e., sweet, sour, salty, and bitter (multiple forced-choice). To obtain an impression of overall gustatory function, the number of correctly identified tastes was summed up for a "taste score".

Results: Taste function decreased significantly with age. Women exhibited significantly higher taste scores than men which was true for all age groups. The taste score at the 10(th) percentile was selected as a cut-off value to distinguish normogeusia from hypogeusia. Results from a small series of patients with ageusia confirmed the clinical usefulness of the proposed normative values.

Conclusion: The present data provide normative values for the "Taste Strips" based on over 500 subjects tested.

Citing Articles

Taste impairment in patients with Parkinsonism.

Zhu Q, Liu H, Wang J, Feng R, Ma M, Wang X J Neurol. 2025; 272(3):238.

PMID: 40024924 PMC: 11872754. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-025-12983-8.


The Neural Basis of Salt Perception: A Focus on Potassium Chloride as a Sodium Alternative.

Iannilli E, Furer R, Welge-Lussen A, Hummel T Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003616 PMC: 11856358. DOI: 10.3390/life15020207.


Investigating factors influencing subjective taste and smell alterations in colorectal cancer patients.

Wang W, Li Z, Zhang X, Li Y, Kong S, Zou B Support Care Cancer. 2025; 33(3):205.

PMID: 39971802 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-025-09267-2.


Chemosensory and cardiometabolic improvements after a fasting-mimicking diet: A randomized cross-over clinical trial.

Micarelli A, Mrakic-Sposta S, Vezzoli A, Malacrida S, Caputo S, Micarelli B Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101971.

PMID: 39970875 PMC: 11866515. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2025.101971.


Associations with Taste, Diet, and Health in an Italian Population.

Stevens H, Graham C, Concas M, Piluso F, Mavrommatis Y, King A Nutrients. 2025; 17(2.

PMID: 39861458 PMC: 11769509. DOI: 10.3390/nu17020329.


References
1.
Simon S, de Araujo I, Gutierrez R, Nicolelis M . The neural mechanisms of gustation: a distributed processing code. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006; 7(11):890-901. DOI: 10.1038/nrn2006. View

2.
Stillman J, Morton R, Hay K, Ahmad Z, Goldsmith D . Electrogustometry: strengths, weaknesses, and clinical evidence of stimulus boundaries. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 2003; 28(5):406-10. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2273.2003.00729.x. View

3.
Doty R, Shaman P, Applebaum S, Giberson R, Siksorski L, Rosenberg L . Smell identification ability: changes with age. Science. 1984; 226(4681):1441-3. DOI: 10.1126/science.6505700. View

4.
Just T, Pau H, Bombor I, Guthoff R, Fietkau R, Hummel T . Confocal microscopy of the peripheral gustatory system: comparison between healthy subjects and patients suffering from taste disorders during radiochemotherapy. Laryngoscope. 2005; 115(12):2178-82. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLG.0000181502.07160.86. View

5.
Kobal G, Klimek L, Wolfensberger M, Gudziol H, Temmel A, Owen C . Multicenter investigation of 1,036 subjects using a standardized method for the assessment of olfactory function combining tests of odor identification, odor discrimination, and olfactory thresholds. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2000; 257(4):205-11. DOI: 10.1007/s004050050223. View