» Articles » PMID: 19219500

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles of Salmonella Enterica Serotypes Recovered from Pens of Commercial Feedlot Cattle Using Different Types of Composite Samples

Overview
Journal Curr Microbiol
Specialty Microbiology
Date 2009 Feb 17
PMID 19219500
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Salmonella enterica in cattle production systems may be associated with important human and animal disease issues. However, tremendous diversity exists among Salmonella recovered, and more information is needed about strains of greatest potential health concern, particularly those that are multidrug resistant (MDR). By characterizing Salmonella isolates from commercial feedlot pens, this study aimed to evaluate the strain diversity and prevalence of MDR Salmonella from different types of composite pen samples. Antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, serotype, and presence or absence of the integron-encoded intI1 gene were determined for 530 Salmonella isolates recovered using composite rope (n = 335), feces (n = 59), and water (n = 136) samples from 21 pens in 3 feedlots. The study investigated only pens with available isolates from multiple sample types. Most isolates (83.0%) of the 19 Salmonella serotypes identified were susceptible or intermediately susceptible to all the antimicrobials evaluated. Resistance to sulfisoxazole (14.9%), streptomycin (3.8%), and tetracycline (3.6%) were the most common. None of the isolates tested positive for a class 1 integron, and only 2.5% were resistant to multiple antimicrobials. All the MDR isolates, namely, serotypes Uganda (n = 9), Typhimurium (n = 2), and Give (n = 2), were resistant to at least five antimicrobials. Most MDR isolates (n = 11) were from two pens during 1 week within one feedlot. Overall, many Salmonella isolates collected within a pen were similar in terms of serotype and antimicrobial susceptibility regardless of sample type. However, MDR Salmonella and rare serotypes were not recovered frequently enough to suggest a general strategy for appropriate composite sampling of feedlot cattle populations for Salmonella detection and monitoring.

Citing Articles

Predicting MIC and Deciphering Genomic Determinants of Antibiotic Resistance and Susceptibility.

Ayoola M, Das A, Krishnan B, Smith D, Nanduri B, Ramkumar M Microorganisms. 2024; 12(1).

PMID: 38257961 PMC: 10819212. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12010134.


Association of IS with Multidrug Resistance in Isolates from Cattle ().

Lewis G, Fenton R, Moriyama E, Loy J, Moxley R Microorganisms. 2023; 11(3).

PMID: 36985205 PMC: 10051122. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11030631.


Diversity of multidrug-resistant salmonella enterica strains associated with cattle at harvest in the United States.

Brichta-Harhay D, Arthur T, Bosilevac J, Kalchayanand N, Shackelford S, Wheeler T Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011; 77(5):1783-96.

PMID: 21239549 PMC: 3067267. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01885-10.

References
1.
. Outbreak of multidrug-resistant Salmonella newport--United States, January-April 2002. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2002; 51(25):545-8. View

2.
Zhang H, Shi L, Li L, Guo S, Zhang X, Yamasaki S . Identification and characterization of class 1 integron resistance gene cassettes among Salmonella strains isolated from healthy humans in China. Microbiol Immunol. 2004; 48(9):639-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2004.tb03473.x. View

3.
Dargatz D, Fedorka-Cray P, Ladely S, Ferris K, Green A, Headrick M . Antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of Salmonella isolates from cattle in feedlots. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2002; 221(2):268-72. DOI: 10.2460/javma.2002.221.268. View

4.
Dargatz D, Fedorka-Cray P, Ladely S, Kopral C, Ferris K, Headrick M . Prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella spp. isolates from US cattle in feedlots in 1999 and 2000. J Appl Microbiol. 2003; 95(4):753-61. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2003.02034.x. View

5.
Kunze D, Loneragan G, Platt T, Miller M, Besser T, Koohmaraie M . Salmonella enterica burden in harvest-ready cattle populations from the southern high plains of the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007; 74(2):345-51. PMC: 2223257. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.02076-07. View