» Articles » PMID: 19212171

Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials on the Role of Mechanical Bowel Preparation Before Colorectal Surgery

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2009 Feb 13
PMID 19212171
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Earlier meta-analyses of small randomized trials suggested that mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) should be omitted before colorectal surgery because it does not affect complication rates 0 mortality and may be even harmful; however, more recent large randomized trials suggested an increased occurrence of pelvic abscesses in the absence of MBP. Therefore, an updated large meta-analysis was conducted to re-evaluate the role of MBP in colorectal surgery. Furthermore, the influence of different kind of MBP regimes on infectious outcomes was examined.

Methods: The meta-analysis was conducted according to the QUOROM statement; the inclusion criteria were randomized clinical trials comparing MBP with no MBP before colorectal surgery. The primary outcome was anastomotic leakage; secondary outcomes were other septic complications.

Results: Fourteen trials were included with a total number of 4859 patients: 2452 in the MBP group and 2407 in the no MBP group. We found no statistical difference between the groups for anastomotic leakage [OR = 1.12 (0.82-1.53), P = 0.46], pelvic or abdominal abscess (P = 0.75), and wound sepsis (P = 0.11). When all surgical site infections were considered, the meta-analysis favored no MBP [OR = 1.40 (1.05-1.87), P = 0.02].Sensitivity analyses showed similar results for all subgroups but when poor or small trials were excluded, there was a slightly higher risk of deep abdominal abscesses with no MBP, however, the number needed to harm was as high as 333 patients, suggesting this difference to be not clinically relevant. The use of different MBP regimes did not influence primary and secondary outcomes. The main limitation concerned rectal surgery for which the limited data preclude any interpretation.

Conclusion: Although it did not confirm the harmful effect of mechanical bowel preparation (suggested by previous meta-analyses), this meta-analysis including almost 5000 patients, demonstrates with a high level of evidence that any kind of mechanical bowel preparation should be omitted before colonic surgery.

Citing Articles

Left iliac fossa sigmoidectomy with mechanical anastomosis in the management of uncomplicated sigmoid volvulus: an observational study at Principal Hospital of Dakar, Senegal.

Dieme E, Ndiaye B, Faye M, Faye S, Diop M, Mboup M Pan Afr Med J. 2025; 49:60.

PMID: 39911363 PMC: 11795124. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2024.49.60.42676.


Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States.

Farah A J Minim Invasive Surg. 2024; 27(4):232-233.

PMID: 39675758 PMC: 11647183. DOI: 10.7602/jmis.2024.27.4.232.


What Is the Role of the Gut Microbiota in Anastomotic Leakage After Colorectal Resection? A Scoping Review of Clinical and Experimental Studies.

Lianos G, Frountzas M, Kyrochristou I, Sakarellos P, Tatsis V, Kyrochristou G J Clin Med. 2024; 13(22).

PMID: 39597778 PMC: 11594793. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13226634.


Pre-Operative Mechanical Bowel Preparation Does Not Affect the Impact of Anastomosis Leakage in Left-Side Colorectal Surgery-A Single Center Observational Study.

Danihel L, cerny M, Dropco I, Zrnikova P, Schnorrer M, Smolar M Life (Basel). 2024; 14(9).

PMID: 39337876 PMC: 11432933. DOI: 10.3390/life14091092.


Does mechanical bowel preparation really prevent complications after colorectal surgery depending on the lesion localization? A myth or fact?.

Benli S, Tikici D, Baysan C, Turkmenoglu M, Colak T Turk J Surg. 2023; 39(3):222-230.

PMID: 38058372 PMC: 10696451. DOI: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2023.6059.