» Articles » PMID: 19211001

Intrinsic Feedback Factors Producing Inertial Compensation in Muscle

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2009 Feb 13
PMID 19211001
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An attempt was made to determine the factors causing the load-inertia compensation that has been observed in skeletal muscle. Cat skeletal muscle force output was determined as a function of the two variables, length and stimulus pulse rate. The results were represented in a system diagram from which it becomes apparent that: (a) the length-tension relationship in muscle forms a functional, non-neural servo feedback; (b) the force-velocity curve appears as an oscillation-damping, velocity feedback in the muscle servo; (c) the nonlinear action of pulse rate on response is, in effect, in the input element to the muscle servo system. For purpose of analysis of the motor system it appears that these signal handling characteristics of muscle make it more nearly a "position servo" than a "force motor."

Citing Articles

Sensory control of normal movement and of movement aided by neural prostheses.

Prochazka A J Anat. 2015; 227(2):167-77.

PMID: 26047134 PMC: 4523319. DOI: 10.1111/joa.12311.


Skeletal muscle contraction. The thorough definition of the contractile event requires both load acceleration and load mass to be known.

Grazi E, Pozzati S Theor Biol Med Model. 2010; 7(1):24.

PMID: 20565823 PMC: 2900230. DOI: 10.1186/1742-4682-7-24.


EMG responses to unexpected perturbations are delayed in slower movements.

David F, Poon C, Niu C, Corcos D, Shapiro M Exp Brain Res. 2009; 199(1):27-38.

PMID: 19701630 PMC: 8190577. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-009-1967-2.


Fast aiming movements with the left and right arm: evidence for two-process theories of motor control.

Heuer H Psychol Res. 1981; 43(1):81-96.

PMID: 7280145 DOI: 10.1007/BF00309640.


Accurate repositioning of the human thumb against unpredictable dynamic loads is dependent upon peripheral feed-back.

Day B, Marsden C J Physiol. 1982; 327:393-407.

PMID: 7120145 PMC: 1225115. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1982.sp014238.


References
1.
Partridge L . MODIFICATIONS OF NEURAL OUTPUT SIGNALS BY MUSCLES: A FREQUENCY RESPONSE STUDY. J Appl Physiol. 1965; 20:150-6. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1965.20.1.150. View

2.
Aubert X . [Relation between strength and speed of extension and contraction of striated muscle]. Arch Int Physiol Biochim. 1956; 64(1):121-2. View

3.
Partridge L . Signal-handling characteristics of load-moving skeletal muscle. Am J Physiol. 1966; 210(5):1178-91. DOI: 10.1152/ajplegacy.1966.210.5.1178. View

4.
FENN W, Marsh B . Muscular force at different speeds of shortening. J Physiol. 1935; 85(3):277-97. PMC: 1394554. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1935.sp003318. View

5.
JEWELL B, WILKIE D . An analysis of the mechanical components in frog's striated muscle. J Physiol. 1958; 143(3):515-40. PMC: 1356730. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1958.sp006075. View