» Articles » PMID: 19210196

Systematic Review of Stroke Thrombolysis Service Configuration

Overview
Specialties Neurology
Pharmacology
Date 2009 Feb 13
PMID 19210196
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator is a highly effective treatment for acute ischemic stroke, but routine provision is challenging. We compared the activity, safety and response times of five service configurations: local services, redirection of selected or all suspected stroke patients by emergency medical services (EMS) to stroke centers and the use of telemedicine with and without secondary transfer to a stroke center. In total, 59 relevant service descriptions were identified. Pooled treatment rates (mean +/- standard deviation [SD]) per 100 confirmed stroke patients were: local service design, 2.5 +/- 2.5 (n = 21417); EMS redirection of only patients potentially eligible for thrombolysis, 3.9 +/- 1.2 (n = 1872); EMS redirection of all suspected stroke patients, 3.8 +/- 1.1 (n = 5427); telemedicine with secondary transfer, 6.9 (no pooled SD; n = 749); and telemedicine without secondary transfer, 3.4 (no pooled SD; n = 6610). A comprehensive stroke patient register was completed for only five regional collaborations, resulting in pooled ischemic stroke treatment rates of 5.7 (95% confidence interval: 4.6-6.9; n = 7815) compared with 3.1 (95% confidence interval: 2.1-4.1; n = 31411) for local services. Pooled symptomatic hemorrhage rates were similar for all service designs (range: 3.9-5.1%). Average door-needle times exceeded 60 min in most studies. We conclude that regional collaborations achieve higher rates of thrombolysis than local services working in isolation. Stroke services should continue to publish thrombolysis activity and safety data in a recommended format in order to determine the most suitable configuration for different settings.

Citing Articles

Hub-and-Spoke Stroke System: Enhancing Acute Ischemic Stroke Care in the Philippines.

Batino L, Cinco M, Navarro J Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2024; 14(1):95-100.

PMID: 39043151 PMC: 11521431. DOI: 10.1159/000540484.


Characteristics of patients who had a stroke not initially identified during emergency prehospital assessment: a systematic review.

Jones S, Bray J, Gibson J, McClelland G, Miller C, Price C Emerg Med J. 2021; 38(5):387-393.

PMID: 33608393 PMC: 8077214. DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2020-209607.


The Hyperdense Middle Cerebral Artery Sign in Drip-and-Ship Models of Acute Stroke Management.

Jodaitis L, Ligot N, Chapusette R, Bonnet T, Gaspard N, Naeije G Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2020; 10(1):36-43.

PMID: 32344421 PMC: 7289154. DOI: 10.1159/000506971.


The impact of acute stroke service centralisation: a time series evaluation.

Elameer M, Price C, Flynn D, Rodgers H Future Healthc J. 2019; 5(3):181-187.

PMID: 31098563 PMC: 6502604. DOI: 10.7861/futurehosp.5-3-181.


Can I Send This Patient with Stroke Home? Strategies Managing Transient Ischemic Attack and Minor Stroke in the Emergency Department.

Chang B, Rostanski S, Willey J, Kummer B, Miller E, Elkind M J Emerg Med. 2018; 54(5):636-644.

PMID: 29321107 PMC: 6446571. DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.12.015.