» Articles » PMID: 19206819

The Contribution of Obstruent Consonants and Acoustic Landmarks to Speech Recognition in Noise

Overview
Journal J Acoust Soc Am
Date 2009 Feb 12
PMID 19206819
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The obstruent consonants (e.g., stops) are more susceptible to noise than vowels, raising the question whether the degradation of speech intelligibility in noise can be attributed, at least partially, to the loss of information carried by obstruent consonants. Experiment 1 assesses the contribution of obstruent consonants to speech recognition in noise by presenting sentences containing clean obstruent consonants but noise-corrupted voiced sounds (e.g., vowels). Results indicated substantial (threefold) improvement in speech recognition, particularly at low signal-to-noise ratio levels (-5 dB). Experiment 2 assessed the importance of providing partial information, within a frequency region, of the obstruent-consonant spectra while leaving the remaining spectral region unaltered (i.e., noise corrupted). Access to the low-frequency (0-1000 Hz) region of the clean obstruent-consonant spectra was found to be sufficient to realize significant improvements in performance and that was attributed to improvement in transmission of voicing information. The outcomes from the two experiments suggest that much of the improvement in performance must be due to the enhanced access to acoustic landmarks, evident in spectral discontinuities signaling the onsets of obstruent consonants. These landmarks, often blurred in noisy conditions, are critically important for understanding speech in noise for better determination of the syllable structure and word boundaries.

Citing Articles

Temporal fine structure influences voicing confusions for consonant identification in multi-talker babble.

Viswanathan V, Shinn-Cunningham B, Heinz M J Acoust Soc Am. 2021; 150(4):2664.

PMID: 34717498 PMC: 8514254. DOI: 10.1121/10.0006527.


The effect of increased channel interaction on speech perception with cochlear implants.

Goehring T, Archer-Boyd A, Arenberg J, Carlyon R Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):10383.

PMID: 34001987 PMC: 8128897. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-89932-8.


Attention selectively modulates cortical entrainment in different regions of the speech spectrum.

Baltzell L, Horton C, Shen Y, Richards V, DZmura M, Srinivasan R Brain Res. 2016; 1644:203-12.

PMID: 27195825 PMC: 4915733. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2016.05.029.


Evaluation of a spectral subtraction strategy to suppress reverberant energy in cochlear implant devices.

Kokkinakis K, Runge C, Tahmina Q, Hu Y J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 138(1):115-24.

PMID: 26233012 PMC: 5392068. DOI: 10.1121/1.4922331.


Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.

Fogerty D, Ahlstrom J, Bologna W, Dubno J J Acoust Soc Am. 2015; 137(6):3487-501.

PMID: 26093436 PMC: 4474944. DOI: 10.1121/1.4921603.


References
1.
Stevens K . Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. J Acoust Soc Am. 2002; 111(4):1872-91. DOI: 10.1121/1.1458026. View

2.
Blumstein S, Stevens K . Acoustic invariance in speech production: evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. J Acoust Soc Am. 1979; 66(4):1001-17. DOI: 10.1121/1.383319. View

3.
Owren M, Cardillo G . The relative roles of vowels and consonants in discriminating talker identity versus word meaning. J Acoust Soc Am. 2006; 119(3):1727-39. DOI: 10.1121/1.2161431. View

4.
Goldsworthy R, Greenberg J . Analysis of speech-based Speech Transmission Index methods with implications for nonlinear operations. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 116(6):3679-89. DOI: 10.1121/1.1804628. View

5.
Delgutte B, Kiang N . Speech coding in the auditory nerve: IV. Sounds with consonant-like dynamic characteristics. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984; 75(3):897-907. DOI: 10.1121/1.390599. View