» Articles » PMID: 19200401

Validation of the Finnish Version of the SCOFF Questionnaire Among Young Adults Aged 20 to 35 Years

Overview
Journal BMC Psychiatry
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Feb 10
PMID 19200401
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: We tested the validity of the SCOFF, a five-question screening instrument for eating disorders, in a general population sample.

Methods: A random sample of 1863 Finnish young adults was approached with a questionnaire that contained several screens for mental health interview, including the SCOFF. The questionnaire was returned by 1316 persons. All screen positives and a random sample of screen negatives were invited to SCID interview. Altogether 541 subjects participated in the SCID interview and had filled in the SCOFF questionnaire. We investigated the validity of the SCOFF in detecting current eating disorders by calculating sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) for different cut-off scores. We also performed a ROC analysis based on these 541 persons, of whom nine had current eating disorder.

Results: The threshold of two positive answers presented the best ability to detect eating disorders, with a sensitivity of 77.8%, a specificity of 87.6%, a PPV of 9.7%, and a NPV of 99.6%. None of the subjects with current eating disorder scored zero points in the SCOFF.

Conclusion: Due to its low PPV, there are limitations in using the SCOFF as a screening instrument in unselected population samples. However, it might be used for ruling out the possibility of eating disorders.

Citing Articles

Validation of the SCOFF as a Simple Screening Tool for Eating Disorders in an Inpatient Sample Before and During COVID-19.

Beer C, Luken L, Eggendorf J, Holtmann M, Legenbauer T Int J Eat Disord. 2024; 58(1):243-247.

PMID: 39503151 PMC: 11784830. DOI: 10.1002/eat.24318.


The use and misuse of the SCOFF screening measure over two decades: a systematic literature review.

Coop A, Clark A, Morgan J, Reid F, Lacey J Eat Weight Disord. 2024; 29(1):29.

PMID: 38652332 PMC: 11039549. DOI: 10.1007/s40519-024-01656-6.


Adverse childhood experiences increase the risk for eating disorders among adolescents.

Kovacs-Toth B, Olah B, Kuritarne Szabo I, Tury F Front Psychol. 2022; 13:1063693.

PMID: 36578685 PMC: 9791097. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1063693.


Eating disorder measures in a sample of military veterans: A focus on gender, age, and race/ethnicity.

Mitchell K, Masheb R, Smith B, Kehle-Forbes S, Hardin S, Vogt D Psychol Assess. 2021; 33(12):1226-1238.

PMID: 34292003 PMC: 8720058. DOI: 10.1037/pas0001050.


The relationship between the risk of eating disorder and meal patterns in University students.

Kabakus Aykut M, Bilici S Eat Weight Disord. 2021; 27(2):579-587.

PMID: 33881762 DOI: 10.1007/s40519-021-01179-4.


References
1.
Rueda G, Diaz L, Campo A, Barros J, Avila G, Orostegui L . [Validation of the SCOFF questionnaire for screening of eating disorders in university women]. Biomedica. 2005; 25(2):196-202. View

2.
Morgan J, Reid F, Lacey J . The SCOFF questionnaire: assessment of a new screening tool for eating disorders. BMJ. 1999; 319(7223):1467-8. PMC: 28290. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.319.7223.1467. View

3.
Siervo M, Boschi V, Papa A, Bellini O, Falconi C . Application of the SCOFF, Eating Attitude Test 26 (EAT 26) and Eating Inventory (TFEQ) Questionnaires in young women seeking diet-therapy. Eat Weight Disord. 2005; 10(2):76-82. DOI: 10.1007/BF03327528. View

4.
Pirkola S, Isometsa E, Suvisaari J, Aro H, Joukamaa M, Poikolainen K . DSM-IV mood-, anxiety- and alcohol use disorders and their comorbidity in the Finnish general population--results from the Health 2000 Study. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2004; 40(1):1-10. DOI: 10.1007/s00127-005-0848-7. View

5.
Rodriguez Martin A, Novalbos Ruiz J, Martinez Nieto J, Escobar Jimenez L, Castro de Haro A . Epidemiological study of the influence of family and socioeconomic status in disorders of eating behaviour. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2004; 58(6):846-52. DOI: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1601884. View