» Articles » PMID: 19196697

Comparison of 3 Cytotoxicity Screening Assays and Their Application to the Selection of Novel Antibacterial Hits

Overview
Journal J Biomol Screen
Publisher Sage Publications
Date 2009 Feb 7
PMID 19196697
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cytotoxicity screening of new chemical entities in antibacterial drug discovery discerns between cytotoxic and antimicrobial activity, thus providing predictive evidence for selective toxicity. The objective of this study was to evaluate 3 cytotoxicity assays in identifying novel antibacterial hits with desired safety margins. The endpoints in assays comprised adenylate kinase (AK) release rate as an indicator of membrane rupture (Toxilight), intracellular adenosine triphosphate (CellTiter-Glo), and reduction of resazurin (CellTiter-Blue) both as indicators of cell metabolic activity. In the CellTiter-Glo and the CellTiter-Blue assays, 7 of 8 selected compounds showed cytotoxicity, whereas in the Toxilight assay, 3 of 8 compounds significantly reduced cell viability in the ChoK1 and the JurkatE6.1 cell line. The CellTiter-Glo assay proved to be the most sensitive among the evaluated assays, and excellent Z' values were obtained in the 96-well plate (Z' > 0.83). The CellTiter-Glo assay was clearly superior to the CellTiter-Blue and the Toxilight assay for the initial cytotoxicity screening. Moreover, the application of the CellTiter-Glo assay to determine mammalian cell toxicity versus the antibacterial effect ratio contributed to early identification of antibacterial hits with desired safety margins. The chemical structures of these novel antibacterial hits are disclosed herein.

Citing Articles

Design, Synthesis, and Activity Evaluation of C-23-Modified 5--Mycaminosyltylonolide Derivatives.

Fan Z, Lin Z, Zhai H, Cao Y, Wang H, Maiga A ACS Med Chem Lett. 2024; 15(12):2171-2180.

PMID: 39691534 PMC: 11647724. DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.4c00458.


Evaluating Blood-Brain Barrier Permeability, Cytotoxicity, and Activity of Potential Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors: In Vitro and In Silico Study.

Maboko L, Theron A, Panayides J, Cordier W, Fisher D, Steenkamp V Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2024; 12(6):e70043.

PMID: 39651604 PMC: 11841676. DOI: 10.1002/prp2.70043.


Upregulation of LHPP by saRNA inhibited hepatocellular cancer cell proliferation and xenograft tumor growth.

Bi C, Kang T, Qian Y, Kang M, Zeng X, Li L PLoS One. 2024; 19(5):e0299522.

PMID: 38696452 PMC: 11065268. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0299522.


Multiparametric quantitative phase imaging for real-time, single cell, drug screening in breast cancer.

Polanco E, Moustafa T, Butterfield A, Scherer S, Cortes-Sanchez E, Bodily T Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):794.

PMID: 35941353 PMC: 9360018. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-03759-1.


Influence of surface topography on PCL electrospun scaffolds for liver tissue engineering.

Gao Y, Callanan A J Mater Chem B. 2021; 9(38):8081-8093.

PMID: 34491259 PMC: 8493469. DOI: 10.1039/d1tb00789k.