» Articles » PMID: 19196133

Positively and Negatively Modulating Cell Adhesion to Type I Collagen Via Peptide Grafting

Overview
Date 2009 Feb 7
PMID 19196133
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The biophysical interactions between cells and type I collagen are controlled by the level of cell adhesion, which is dictated primarily by the density of ligands on collagen and the density of integrin receptors on cells. The native adhesivity of collagen was modulated by covalently grafting glycine-arginine-glycine-aspartic acid-serine (GRGDS), which includes the bioactive RGD sequence, or glycine-arginine-aspartic acid-glycine-serine (GRDGS), which includes the scrambled RDG sequence, to collagen with the hetero-bifunctional coupling agent 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide. The peptide-grafted collagen self-assembled into a fibrillar gel with negligible changes in gel structure and rheology. Rat dermal fibroblasts (RDFs) and human smooth muscle cells demonstrated increased levels of adhesion on gels prepared from RGD-grafted collagen, and decreased levels of adhesion on RDG-grafted collagen. Both cell types demonstrated an increased ability to compact free-floating RGD-grafted collagen gels, and an impaired ability to compact RDG-grafted gels. RDF migration on and within collagen was increased with RDG-grafted collagen and decreased with RGD-grafted collagen, and dose-response experiments indicated a biphasic response of RDF migration to adhesion. Smooth muscle cells demonstrated similar, though not statistically significant, trends. The ability to both positively and negatively modulate cell adhesion to collagen increases the versatility of this natural biomaterial for regenerative therapies.

Citing Articles

Advanced In Vitro Three-Dimensional Skin Models of Atopic Dermatitis.

Jang H, Lee J, Yoon J Tissue Eng Regen Med. 2023; 20(4):539-552.

PMID: 36995643 PMC: 10313606. DOI: 10.1007/s13770-023-00532-1.


Design and Evaluation of Engineered Extracellular Vesicle (EV)-Based Targeting for EGFR-Overexpressing Tumor Cells Using Monobody Display.

Komuro H, Aminova S, Lauro K, Woldring D, Harada M Bioengineering (Basel). 2022; 9(2).

PMID: 35200409 PMC: 8869414. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering9020056.


Electroconductive Gelatin Methacryloyl-PEDOT:PSS Composite Hydrogels: Design, Synthesis, and Properties.

Spencer A, Primbetova A, Koppes A, Koppes R, Fenniri H, Annabi N ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2021; 4(5):1558-1567.

PMID: 33445313 PMC: 11150039. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b00135.


Hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels with independently tunable mechanical and bioactive signaling features.

Godesky M, Shreiber D Biointerphases. 2020; 14(6):061005.

PMID: 31896261 PMC: 7008889. DOI: 10.1063/1.5126493.


Poly-ε-lysine based hydrogels as synthetic substrates for the expansion of corneal endothelial cells for transplantation.

Kennedy S, Lace R, Carserides C, Gallagher A, Wellings D, Williams R J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2019; 30(9):102.

PMID: 31485761 PMC: 6726667. DOI: 10.1007/s10856-019-6303-1.


References
1.
Zaman M . Understanding the molecular basis for differential binding of integrins to collagen and gelatin. Biophys J. 2006; 92(2):L17-9. PMC: 1751409. DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.106.097519. View

2.
Dunn G, Brown A . A unified approach to analysing cell motility. J Cell Sci Suppl. 1987; 8:81-102. DOI: 10.1242/jcs.1987.supplement_8.5. View

3.
Bet M, Goissis G, Vargas S, Selistre-de-Araujo H . Cell adhesion and cytotoxicity studies over polyanionic collagen surfaces with variable negative charge and wettability. Biomaterials. 2002; 24(1):131-7. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00270-3. View

4.
Galbraith C, Sheetz M . Keratocytes pull with similar forces on their dorsal and ventral surfaces. J Cell Biol. 1999; 147(6):1313-24. PMC: 2168090. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.147.6.1313. View

5.
Humphries M, Akiyama S, Komoriya A, Olden K, Yamada K . Identification of an alternatively spliced site in human plasma fibronectin that mediates cell type-specific adhesion. J Cell Biol. 1986; 103(6 Pt 2):2637-47. PMC: 2114617. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.103.6.2637. View