» Articles » PMID: 19195692

Role of Extent of Fascia Preservation and Erectile Function After Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Prostatectomy

Overview
Journal Urology
Specialty Urology
Date 2009 Feb 7
PMID 19195692
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To test a simple intraoperative scoring system for the circumferential extent of fascia preservation (FP) for the prediction of postoperative erectile function. With the advent of robotic and endoscopic surgery for prostate cancer, more extensive FP has emerged as a method to improve postoperative erectile function.

Methods: A total of 107 consecutive cases with normal preoperative erectile function were treated using robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer. The erectile, sexual, and global quality of life outcomes using the European Organization for Research and Treatment and Cancer Quality of Life questionnaire-C30 and prostate cancer-specific 25-item questionnaire were assessed at 6 months postoperatively.

Results: At 6 months postoperatively, 57 men (53%) reported no or minimal effects on erectile function with or without the use of a phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor. The patient age at surgery, prostate size, and FP score were associated with erectile function at 6 months postoperatively. The mean FP score was 9.2 +/- 2.8 and 4.7 +/- 2.4 for patients without and with erectile dysfunction postoperatively, respectively. On multivariate analysis, the FP score and patient age at surgery were the best predictors of postoperative erectile function. No correlation between the FP score and positive surgical resection margin rate was observed. A greater FP score predicted for greater questionnaire-based libido, sexual activity, and sexual function scores.

Conclusions: A scoring system for the extent of circumferential FP during prostatectomy is a stronger predictor of postoperative erectile function recovery than is laterality (bilateral or unilateral) or fascial depth (interfascial or intrafascial). More ventral FP significantly contributed to postoperative erectile function recovery.

Citing Articles

Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Cn T, Il C, Mj H, Mpj N, Ham V, Pj V Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(11):738.

PMID: 39432123 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08936-y.


Anxiety, depression, urinary continence, and sexuality in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: preliminary findings.

Tozzi M, Jannello L, Silvaggi M, Michetti P Support Care Cancer. 2024; 32(5):294.

PMID: 38635029 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-08503-5.


Re. van den Berg et al, Deep learning for automated contouring of neurovascular structures on magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer patients.

Grivas N, Cox I, Boellaard T, van der Poel H Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2023; 28:100513.

PMID: 38077269 PMC: 10709076. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100513.


Development and clinical applicability of MRI-based 3D prostate models in the planning of nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.

Veerman H, Boellaard T, van der Eijk J, Sluijter J, Roeleveld T, van der Sluis T J Robot Surg. 2022; 17(2):509-517.

PMID: 35819591 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01443-4.


Toggling Technique Allows Retrograde Early Release to Facilitate Neurovascular Bundle Sparing During Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Propensity Score-Matching Study.

Shim J, Tae J, Noh T, Kang S, Cheon J, Lee J J Korean Med Sci. 2022; 37(1):e6.

PMID: 34981681 PMC: 8723890. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2022.37.e6.