» Articles » PMID: 19194333

The Effects of the Balanced Budget Act of 1997 on Home Health and Hospice in Older Adult Cancer Patients

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 2009 Feb 6
PMID 19194333
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Home health and hospice services can constitute important elements in the continuum of care for older adults diagnosed with cancer. The Balanced Budget Act (BBA) of 1997 included provisions affecting those services.

Objectives: The first objective of this study is to assess the effect of the BBA of 1997 on home health and hospice service utilization in older cancer patients. The second objective is to estimate the effect of the BBA of 1997 on costs associated specifically with home health and hospice services and on total costs of care. The final objective is to evaluate the effect of the BBA of 1997 on mortality in these patients.

Research Design: Longitudinal analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare Database, covering a service area that includes 26% of the US population.

Participants: Community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries 65 years of age and older.

Measures: Utilization rates of home health and hospice services; costs associated with those services, and total costs of care; and mortality.

Results: Home health utilization rates dropped substantially and hospice utilization rates increased after the BBA. Medicare costs for home health services declined as did total Medicare costs but hospice costs increased. There was no discernable effect on mortality rates.

Conclusions: The BBA was successful in containing the costs of home health services and resulted in savings in overall costs of care for older cancer patients. Reduction in utilization of home health services did not seem to negatively affect outcomes. The BBA may have contributed to the trend of increasing use of hospice care.

Citing Articles

Prospective assessment of dementia on transitions in homeboundness using multistate Markov models.

Ornstein K, Liu S, Husain M, Ankuda C, Bollens-Lund E, Kelley A J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021; 70(4):1117-1126.

PMID: 34951008 PMC: 8986556. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17631.


End-of-life care in Medicare beneficiaries dying with pancreatic cancer.

Sheffield K, Boyd C, Benarroch-Gampel J, Kuo Y, Cooksley C, Riall T Cancer. 2011; 117(21):5003-12.

PMID: 21495020 PMC: 3139734. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.26115.

References
1.
Connor S, Elwert F, Spence C, Christakis N . Geographic variation in hospice use in the United States in 2002. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007; 34(3):277-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2007.03.007. View

2.
Warren J, Klabunde C, Schrag D, Bach P, Riley G . Overview of the SEER-Medicare data: content, research applications, and generalizability to the United States elderly population. Med Care. 2002; 40(8 Suppl):IV-3-18. DOI: 10.1097/01.MLR.0000020942.47004.03. View

3.
Grabowski D, Stevenson D, Huskamp H, Keating N . The influence of Medicare home health payment incentives: does payer source matter?. Inquiry. 2006; 43(2):135-49. DOI: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_43.2.135. View

4.
Komisar H . Rolling back Medicare home health. Health Care Financ Rev. 2003; 24(2):33-55. PMC: 4194789. View

5.
Locher J, Kilgore M, Morrisey M, Ritchie C . Patterns and predictors of home health and hospice use by older adults with cancer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006; 54(8):1206-11. PMC: 2761883. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2006.00833.x. View