» Articles » PMID: 19190294

Peer-mentored Research Development Meeting: a Model for Successful Peer Mentoring Among Junior Level Researchers

Overview
Journal Acad Psychiatry
Publisher Springer
Specialty Psychiatry
Date 2009 Feb 5
PMID 19190294
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This report describes a model for the development, process, and tracking methods of a Peer-mentored Research Development Meeting (PRDM), an interdisciplinary peer mentoring program. The program was initiated in 2004 by a group of postdoctoral scholars and junior faculty from the Schools of the Health Sciences at the University of Pittsburgh.

Method: From February 2004 through February 2006, PRDM's first five members tracked and documented their research activity (e.g., manuscripts, grants) every 4 months. The defining features of PRDM are adherence to a structured frequency and format for meetings, systematic tracking and evaluation of research development activities, and maintenance of ongoing relationships with senior mentors.

Results: During the 24-month data collection period, members were involved in 91 research development projects including grant applications, journal article manuscripts, book chapters, and conference abstracts. Members' productivity increased during the 24-month period, as did the efficiency and focus of the completed projects.

Conclusion: Members increased the efficiency and focus of their research development activities during the study period. Structured peer-mentoring groups have the potential to enhance research productivity among junior investigators in research intensive environments.

Citing Articles

A scoping review of activities intended to reduce publication bias in randomised trials.

Hohlfeld A, Kredo T, Clarke M Syst Rev. 2024; 13(1):310.

PMID: 39707441 PMC: 11660680. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-024-02728-5.


Randomized controlled trial of a group peer mentoring model for U.S. academic medicine research faculty.

Pololi L, Evans A, Brimhall-Vargas M, Civian J, Cooper L, Gibbs B J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e174.

PMID: 37654777 PMC: 10465314. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.589.


Peer mentoring to support career advancement among underrepresented minority faculty in the programs to increase diversity among individuals engaged in health-related research (PRIDE).

Coleman T, Starlard-Davenport A, Onwuemene O, Stepleman L, Pace B J Clin Transl Sci. 2023; 7(1):e107.

PMID: 37313375 PMC: 10260328. DOI: 10.1017/cts.2023.535.


Medical Research Conduct and Publication during Higher Education in Syria: Attitudes, Barriers, Practices, and Possible Solutions.

Hanafi I, Kassem L, Hanafi M, Ahmad S, Abbas O, Hajeer M Avicenna J Med. 2022; 12(3):127-137.

PMID: 36092380 PMC: 9458349. DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1755387.


Impact of the Oklahoma IDeA Network of Biomedical Research Excellence research support and mentoring program for early-stage faculty.

Chou A, Hammon D, Akins D Adv Physiol Educ. 2022; 46(3):443-452.

PMID: 35658613 PMC: 9273261. DOI: 10.1152/advan.00075.2021.


References
1.
Pololi L, Knight S, Dunn K . Facilitating scholarly writing in academic medicine. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19(1):64-8. PMC: 1494689. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.21143.x. View

2.
Jackson V, Palepu A, Szalacha L, Caswell C, Carr P, Inui T . "Having the right chemistry": a qualitative study of mentoring in academic medicine. Acad Med. 2003; 78(3):328-34. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200303000-00020. View

3.
Palepu A, Friedman R, Barnett R, Carr P, Ash A, Szalacha L . Junior faculty members' mentoring relationships and their professional development in U.S. medical schools. Acad Med. 1998; 73(3):318-23. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199803000-00021. View

4.
Edwards K . "Short stops": peer support of scholarly activity. Acad Med. 2002; 77(9):939. DOI: 10.1097/00001888-200209000-00045. View

5.
Pololi L, Knight S . Mentoring faculty in academic medicine. A new paradigm?. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20(9):866-70. PMC: 1490198. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.05007.x. View