» Articles » PMID: 19184037

Accuracy of Integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT in Detecting Pelvic and Paraaortic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Uterine Cancer

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2009 Feb 3
PMID 19184037
Citations 39
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose is to evaluate the accuracy of integrated (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography ((CT) with intravenous contrast medium in detecting pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with uterine cancer, with surgical and histopathological findings used as the reference standard. Forty-five patients with endometrial or uterine cervical cancer underwent radical hysterectomy, including pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without paraaortic lymphadenectomy, after PET/CT. PET/CT findings were interpreted by two experienced radiologists in consensus. The criterion for malignancy on PET/CT images was increased tracer uptake by the lymph node, independent of node size. The overall node-based sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and accuracy of PET/CT for detecting nodal metastases were 51.1% (23/45), 99.8% (1,927/1,931), 85.2% (23/27), 98.9% (1,927/1,949) and 98.7% (1,950/1,976), respectively. The sensitivity for detecting metastatic lesions 4 mm or less in short-axis diameter was 12.5% (2/16), that for between 5 and 9 mm was 66.7% (16/24), and that for 10 mm or larger was 100.0% (5/5). The overall patient-based sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ((PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy were 50% (6/12), 90.9% (30/33), 66.7% (6/9), 83.3% (30/36) and 80.0% (36/45), respectively. Integrated FDG-PET/contrast-enhanced CT is superior to conventional imaging, but only moderately sensitive in predicting lymph node metastasis preoperatively in patients with uterine cancer.

Citing Articles

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Radiomics-Based Model for Prediction of Lymph Node Metastasis in Cervical Cancer.

Shi Z, Lu L Int J Gen Med. 2025; 18:1371-1381.

PMID: 40070678 PMC: 11895691. DOI: 10.2147/IJGM.S491986.


The Role of Imaging in Cervical Cancer Staging: ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines (Update 2023).

Fischerova D, Fruhauf F, Burgetova A, Haldorsen I, Gatti E, Cibula D Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398166 PMC: 10886638. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040775.


Treatment Strategies Guided by [18F]FDG-PET/CT in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer and [18F]FDG-Positive Lymph Nodes.

Olthof E, Wenzel H, van der Velden J, Stalpers L, Mom C, van der Aa M Cancers (Basel). 2024; 16(4).

PMID: 38398108 PMC: 10887300. DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040717.


Diagnostic accuracy of MRI, CT, and [F]FDG-PET-CT in detecting lymph node metastases in clinically early-stage cervical cancer - a nationwide Dutch cohort study.

Olthof E, Bergink-Voorthuis B, Wenzel H, Mongula J, van der Velden J, Spijkerboer A Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):36.

PMID: 38332397 PMC: 10853153. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-023-01589-1.


Enhancing the Accuracy of Lymph-Node-Metastasis Prediction in Gynecologic Malignancies Using Multimodal Federated Learning: Integrating CT, MRI, and PET/CT.

Hu Z, Ma L, Ding Y, Zhao X, Shi X, Lu H Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(21).

PMID: 37958454 PMC: 10648189. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15215281.


References
1.
Kostakoglu L, Agress Jr H, Goldsmith S . Clinical role of FDG PET in evaluation of cancer patients. Radiographics. 2003; 23(2):315-40; quiz 533. DOI: 10.1148/rg.232025705. View

2.
Yang W, Lam W, Yu M, Cheung T, Metreweli C . Comparison of dynamic helical CT and dynamic MR imaging in the evaluation of pelvic lymph nodes in cervical carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 175(3):759-66. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750759. View

3.
Rockall A, Sohaib S, Harisinghani M, Babar S, Singh N, Jeyarajah A . Diagnostic performance of nanoparticle-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of lymph node metastases in patients with endometrial and cervical cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23(12):2813-21. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.07.166. View

4.
Creasman W, Morrow C, Bundy B, Homesley H, Graham J, Heller P . Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer. 1987; 60(8 Suppl):2035-41. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19901015)60:8+<2035::aid-cncr2820601515>3.0.co;2-8. View

5.
Stehman F, Bundy B, Disaia P, Keys H, Larson J, Fowler W . Carcinoma of the cervix treated with radiation therapy. I. A multi-variate analysis of prognostic variables in the Gynecologic Oncology Group. Cancer. 1991; 67(11):2776-85. DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19910601)67:11<2776::aid-cncr2820671111>3.0.co;2-l. View