» Articles » PMID: 19181344

Percutaneous US-guided Implantation of Vx-2 Carcinoma into Rabbit Liver: a Comparison with Open Surgical Method

Overview
Journal J Surg Res
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2009 Feb 3
PMID 19181344
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate technical feasibility and experimental usefulness of percutaneous US-guided implantation of Vx-2 carcinoma in rabbit liver.

Materials And Methods: Forty-eight New Zealand White male rabbits were used. Solid tumor mass of Vx-2 carcinoma was harvested from carrier rabbit, and minced tumor cells were implanted. Twenty-four rabbits underwent percutaneous US-guided tumor implantation, and the same number of rabbits underwent open laparotomy tumor implantation. Tested parameters included technical success, procedural time, amount of anesthesia, recovery time, complications, tumor size, and regional tumor seeding.

Results: A new percutaneous US-guided implantation was technically feasible in all rabbits. Evaluation parameters showed that the percutaneous US-guided implantation method is less invasive than the open laparotomy method. Targeting rate for left lateral lobe of implantation site was comparable in both methods (91.7% of percutaneous US-guided; 95.8% in open laparotomy). The success rate of tumor growth in the liver was 100% in both groups. However, in the group with US-guidance, tumor seeding developed more frequently in five of 24 rabbits (20.8%) than in open laparotomy group (2/24, 8.3%). Five rabbits had thoracoabdominal wall needle tract seeding, and two rabbits had tumor seeding at both thoracoabdominal wall and intraperitoneal space.

Conclusions: Percutaneous US-guided implantation of Vx-2 carcinoma in rabbit liver is a less invasive alternative to open laparotomy, achieving equally successful tumor growth in the liver. Although percutaneous US-guidance implantation method may not be considered for long-term survival study design because of the possibility of tumor seeding, it can be considered for nonsurvival study design.

Citing Articles

Cottontail Rabbit Papillomavirus (CRPV) Related Animal Models for Head and Neck Cancer Research: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature.

Bette M, Mandic R Viruses. 2024; 16(11).

PMID: 39599834 PMC: 11598981. DOI: 10.3390/v16111722.


Establishment of a rabbit liver metastasis model by percutaneous puncture of the spleen and implantation of the VX2 tumor strain under CT guidance.

Li B, Feng G, Feng L, Feng X, Zhang Q, Zhang C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):2802.

PMID: 36797324 PMC: 9935920. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-26706-w.


Intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging and shear wave elastography for evaluating peritumoral liver fibrosis after transarterial chemoembolization in a VX2 rabbit liver tumor model.

Cheng Z, Yang Q, He H, Li R, Li X, Jiang H Front Physiol. 2022; 13:893925.

PMID: 36311244 PMC: 9597251. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.893925.


A multimodal nanoparticles-based theranostic method and system.

Gannot I Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol. 2022; 14(4):e1796.

PMID: 35434929 PMC: 9541245. DOI: 10.1002/wnan.1796.


Establishment of a modified percutaneous CT-guided paraspinal intramuscular VX-2 squamous cell carcinoma dual tumor model in rabbits.

Meng L, Shan H, He X, Zhou J, Huang J, Zhang X PeerJ. 2021; 9:e11536.

PMID: 34123599 PMC: 8166237. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.11536.


References
1.
Izumi B, Tashiro S, Miyauchi Y . Anticancer effects of local administration of mitomycin C via the hepatic artery or portal vein on implantation and growth of VX2 cancer injected into rabbit liver. Cancer Res. 1986; 46(8):4167-70. View

2.
Hong K, Kobeiter H, Georgiades C, Torbenson M, Geschwind J . Effects of the type of embolization particles on carboplatin concentration in liver tumors after transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in a rabbit model of liver cancer. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2005; 16(12):1711-7. DOI: 10.1097/01.RVI.0000184535.26360.5A. View

3.
Lin W, Chen J, Lin Y, Han K . Implantation of VX2 carcinoma into the liver of rabbits: a comparison of three direct-injection methods. J Vet Med Sci. 2002; 64(7):649-52. DOI: 10.1292/jvms.64.649. View

4.
Chen J, Lin Y, Huang Y, Chen T, Lin W, Han K . Induction of VX2 carcinoma in rabbit liver: comparison of two inoculation methods. Lab Anim. 2004; 38(1):79-84. DOI: 10.1258/00236770460734434. View

5.
Hong K, Khwaja A, Liapi E, Torbenson M, Georgiades C, Geschwind J . New intra-arterial drug delivery system for the treatment of liver cancer: preclinical assessment in a rabbit model of liver cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(8):2563-7. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-05-2225. View