Diagnostic Performance of Computed Tomography Angiography in Peripheral Arterial Disease: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Overview
Affiliations
Context: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is an increasingly attractive imaging modality for assessing lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (PAD).
Objective: To determine the accuracy of CTA compared with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in differentiating extent of disease in patients with PAD.
Data Sources And Study Selection: Search of MEDLINE (January 1966-August 2008), EMBASE (January 1980-August 2008), and the Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness for studies comparing CTA with intra-arterial DSA for PAD. Eligible studies compared multidetector CTA with intra-arterial DSA, included at least 10 patients with intermittent claudication or critical limb ischemia, aimed to detect more than 50% stenosis or arterial occlusion, and presented either 2 x 2 or 3 x 3 contingency tables (< or = 50% stenosis vs > 50% stenosis or occlusion), or provided data allowing their construction.
Data Extraction: Two reviewers screened potential studies for inclusion and independently extracted study data. Methodological quality was assessed by using the QUADAS instrument.
Data Synthesis: Of 909 studies identified, 20 (2.2%) met the inclusion criteria. These 20 studies had a median sample size of 33 (range, 16-279) and included 957 patients, predominantly with intermittent claudication (68%). Methodological quality was moderate. Overall, the sensitivity of CTA for detecting more than 50% stenosis or occlusion was 95% (95% confidence interval [CI], 92%-97%) and specificity was 96% (95% CI, 93%-97%). Computed tomography angiography correctly identified occlusions in 94% of segments, the presence of more than 50% stenosis in 87% of segments, and absence of significant stenosis in 96% of segments. Overstaging occurred in 8% of segments and understaging in 15%.
Conclusion: Computed tomography angiography is an accurate modality to assess presence and extent of PAD in patients with intermittent claudication; however, methodological weaknesses of examined studies prevent definitive conclusions from these data.
Utilization of double contrast-enhancement boost for lower-extremity CT angiography.
Otgonbaatar C, Ryu J, Jung W, Jang S, Hwang S, Kim T J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2024; 11(6):067001.
PMID: 39634325 PMC: 11614588. DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.11.6.067001.
Li L, Wang M, Jia T, Jiang X, Yang F, Wang Z Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024; 15:1434580.
PMID: 39280000 PMC: 11392728. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1434580.
Meloni A, Maffei E, Positano V, Clemente A, De Gori C, Berti S Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2024; 14(4):698-724.
PMID: 39263472 PMC: 11384460. DOI: 10.21037/cdt-24-52.
Graafen D, Bart W, Halfmann M, Muller L, Hobohm L, Yang Y Eur Radiol Exp. 2024; 8(1):89.
PMID: 39090380 PMC: 11294310. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00481-x.
Current Opinion on Diagnosis of Peripheral Artery Disease in Diabetic Patients.
Ghirardini F, Martini R Medicina (Kaunas). 2024; 60(7).
PMID: 39064610 PMC: 11279131. DOI: 10.3390/medicina60071179.