Cone Beam Computed Tomography, a Low-dose Imaging Technique in the Postoperative Assessment of Cochlear Implantation
Overview
Otorhinolaryngology
Affiliations
Background: Cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has become an extremely useful technique for dentomaxillofacial imaging because it provides clear images of highly contrasted structures. Previous studies evaluating the applicability of this technique in otologic imaging were very encouraging but were only performed in vitro on temporal bone specimens. The intracochlear positioning of the individual electrodes after cochlear implantation by means of CBCT has not yet been shown in vivo.
Objective: We describe a protocol for in vivo postoperative imaging of cochlear implants by CBCT. Moreover, the effective dose was measured and compared with the effective dose used on 4- and 16-slice multislice computed tomography (MSCT) by using a RANDO-phantom.
Main Outcome Measure: Developing a protocol for in vivo postoperative imaging of cochlear implants by CBCT.
Results: CBCT provides high-resolution and almost artifact-free multiplanar reconstruction images allowing assessment of the precise intracochlear position of the electrode and visualization of each of the individual contacts. The calculated effective dose of the used CBCT and MSCT acquisitions is 80 musv for the CBCT, 3,600 musv for the 16-slice computed tomography, and 4,800 musv for the 4-slice computed tomography.
Conclusion: These preliminary results suggests that, for in vivo postoperative evaluation of cochlear implants, CBCT can provide at least the same information as conventional radiography, digital radiograph, and MSCT but in a more comfortable and a much more safer way.
Beyond the otoscope: an imaging review of congenital cholesteatoma.
Vangrinsven G, Bernaerts A, Deckers F, van Dinther J, Zarowski A, De Foer B Insights Imaging. 2024; 15(1):194.
PMID: 39112725 PMC: 11306902. DOI: 10.1186/s13244-024-01761-1.
Comparison of 96-kV and 120-kV cone-beam CT for the assessment of cochlear implants.
Burck I, Yel I, Martin S, Albrecht M, Koch V, Booz C BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):145.
PMID: 38872126 PMC: 11177440. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01322-4.
Munoz-Galvan A, Fiori-Chincaro G, Agudelo-Botero A Rev Cient Odontol (Lima). 2024; 10(1):e100.
PMID: 38389916 PMC: 10880726. DOI: 10.21142/2523-2754-1001-2022-100.
OPTIMISING THE PARAMETERS OF COCHLEAR IMPLANT IMAGING WITH CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY.
Soderqvist S, Sivonen V, Aarnisalo A, Karppi H, Sinkkonen S, Koivisto J Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023; 199(5):462-470.
PMID: 36789742 PMC: 10077498. DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad019.
Waldeck S, Overhoff D, Alizadeh L, Becker B, Port M, Froelich M Tomography. 2022; 8(4):1642-1648.
PMID: 35894001 PMC: 9326530. DOI: 10.3390/tomography8040136.