Moving to Higher Ground: The Dynamic Field Theory and the Dynamics of Visual Cognition

Overview

Journal New Ideas Psychol

Specialty Psychology

Date 2009 Jan 29

PMID 19173013

Citations 28

Authors

Jeffrey S Johnson

John P Spencer

Gregor Schoner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

In the present report, we describe a new dynamic field theory that captures the dynamics of visuo-spatial cognition. This theory grew out of the dynamic systems approach to motor control and development, and is grounded in neural principles. The initial application of dynamic field theory to issues in visuo-spatial cognition extended concepts of the motor approach to decision making in a sensori-motor context, and, more recently, to the dynamics of spatial cognition. Here we extend these concepts still further to address topics in visual cognition, including visual working memory for non-spatial object properties, the processes that underlie change detection, and the 'binding problem' in vision. In each case, we demonstrate that the general principles of the dynamic field approach can unify findings in the literature and generate novel predictions. We contend that the application of these concepts to visual cognition avoids the pitfalls of reductionist approaches in cognitive science, and points toward a formal integration of brains, bodies, and behavior.

Citing Articles

Continuous goal representations: Distance in representational space affects goal switching.

Senftleben U, Frisch S, Dshemuchadse M, Scherbaum S, Surrey C Mem Cognit. 2025; .

PMID: 39836345 DOI: 10.3758/s13421-024-01675-9.

Robust working memory in a two-dimensional continuous attractor network.

Wojtak W, Coombes S, Avitabile D, Bicho E, Erlhagen W Cogn Neurodyn. 2024; 18(6):3273-3289.

PMID: 39712130 PMC: 11655900. DOI: 10.1007/s11571-023-09979-3.

Dynamic Field Theory of Executive Function: Identifying Early Neurocognitive Markers.

McCraw A, Sullivan J, Lowery K, Eddings R, Heim H, Buss A Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2024; 89(3):7-109.

PMID: 39628288 PMC: 11615565. DOI: 10.1111/mono.12478.

Interference between items stored for distinct tasks in visual working memory.

Czoschke S, Peters B, Kaiser J, Bledowski C Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023; 85(5):1461-1473.

PMID: 36720779 PMC: 10372107. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-023-02657-w.

Embodied neuromorphic intelligence.

Bartolozzi C, Indiveri G, Donati E Nat Commun. 2022; 13(1):1024.

PMID: 35197450 PMC: 8866429. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28487-2.

References

Treisman A, Schmidt H . Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cogn Psychol. 1982; 14(1):107-41. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(82)90006-8. View

Cohen A, Ivry R . Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1989; 15(4):650-63. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.15.4.650. View

Fujita I, Tanaka K, Ito M, Cheng K . Columns for visual features of objects in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Nature. 1992; 360(6402):343-6. DOI: 10.1038/360343a0. View

Xu Y, Chun M . Dissociable neural mechanisms supporting visual short-term memory for objects. Nature. 2005; 440(7080):91-5. DOI: 10.1038/nature04262. View

Deco G, Rolls E . A neurodynamical cortical model of visual attention and invariant object recognition. Vision Res. 2003; 44(6):621-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.09.037. View

Olshausen B, Anderson C, Van Essen D . A neurobiological model of visual attention and invariant pattern recognition based on dynamic routing of information. J Neurosci. 1993; 13(11):4700-19. PMC: 6576339. View

Brooks R . New approaches to robotics. Science. 1991; 253(5025):1227-32. DOI: 10.1126/science.253.5025.1227. View

Erlhagen W, Bastian A, Jancke D, Riehle A, Schoner G . The distribution of neuronal population activation (DPA) as a tool to study interaction and integration in cortical representations. J Neurosci Methods. 2000; 94(1):53-66. DOI: 10.1016/s0165-0270(99)00125-9. View

Simmering V, Schutte A, Spencer J . Generalizing the dynamic field theory of spatial cognition across real and developmental time scales. Brain Res. 2007; 1202:68-86. PMC: 2593104. DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2007.06.081. View

10.

Thelen E, Ulrich B . Hidden skills: a dynamic systems analysis of treadmill stepping during the first year. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 1991; 56(1):1-98; discussion 99-104. View

11.

Gegenfurtner K, Sperling G . Information transfer in iconic memory experiments. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993; 19(4):845-66. DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.4.845. View

12.

Itti L, Koch C . Computational modelling of visual attention. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001; 2(3):194-203. DOI: 10.1038/35058500. View

13.

Pessoa L, Ungerleider L . Neural correlates of change detection and change blindness in a working memory task. Cereb Cortex. 2004; 14(5):511-20. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhh013. View

14.

Schoner G, Kelso J . Dynamic pattern generation in behavioral and neural systems. Science. 1988; 239(4847):1513-20. DOI: 10.1126/science.3281253. View

15.

Schoner G . Learning and recall in a dynamic theory of coordination patterns. Biol Cybern. 1989; 62(1):39-54. DOI: 10.1007/BF00217659. View

16.

Simmering V, Spencer J, Schoner G . Reference-related inhibition produces enhanced position discrimination and fast repulsion near axes of symmetry. Percept Psychophys. 2006; 68(6):1027-46. DOI: 10.3758/bf03193363. View

17.

Bastian A, Riehle A, Erlhagen W, Schoner G . Prior information preshapes the population representation of movement direction in motor cortex. Neuroreport. 1998; 9(2):315-9. DOI: 10.1097/00001756-199801260-00025. View

18.

Spencer J, Hund A . Developmental continuity in the processes that underlie spatial recall. Cogn Psychol. 2003; 47(4):432-80. DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0285(03)00099-9. View

19.

Amari S . Dynamics of pattern formation in lateral-inhibition type neural fields. Biol Cybern. 1977; 27(2):77-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF00337259. View

20.

Ashby F, Prinzmetal W, Ivry R, Maddox W . A formal theory of feature binding in object perception. Psychol Rev. 1996; 103(1):165-92. DOI: 10.1037/0033-295x.103.1.165. View