Coordinated and Tailored Work Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial with Economic Evaluation Undertaken with Workers on Sick Leave Due to Musculoskeletal Disorders

Overview

Journal J Occup Rehabil

Publisher Springer

Specialties Occupational Medicine
Rehabilitation Medicine

Date 2009 Jan 27

PMID 19169654

Citations 61

Authors

Ute Bultmann

David Sherson

Jens Olsen

Carl Lysbeck Hansen

Thomas Lund

Jorgen Kilsgaard

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Introduction: In Denmark, the magnitude and impact of work disability on the individual worker and society has prompted the development of a new "coordinated and tailored work rehabilitation" (CTWR) approach. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of CTWR with conventional case management (CCM) on return-to-work of workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs).

Methods: The study was a randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation undertaken with workers on sick leave for 4-12 weeks due to MSDs. CTWR consists of a work disability screening by an interdisciplinary team followed by the collaborative development of a RTW plan. The primary outcome variable was registered cumulative sickness absence hours during 12 months follow-up. Secondary outcomes were work status as well as pain intensity and functional disability, measured at baseline, 3 and 12 months follow-up. The economic evaluation (intervention costs, productivity loss, and health care utilization costs) was based on administrative data derived from national registries.

Results: For the time intervals 0-6 months, 6-12 months, and the entire follow-up period, the number of sickness absence hours was significantly lower in the CTWR group as compared to the control group. The total costs saved in CTWR participants compared to controls were estimated at US $ 1,366 per person at 6 months follow-up and US $ 10,666 per person at 12 months follow-up.

Conclusions: Workers on sick leave for 4-12 weeks due to MSD who underwent "CTWR" by an interdisciplinary team had fewer sickness absence hours than controls. The economic evaluation showed that-in terms of productivity loss-CTWR seems to be cost saving for the society.

Citing Articles

Models of care for managing non-specific low back pain.

Docking S, Sridhar S, Haas R, Mao K, Ramsay H, Buchbinder R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025; 3:CD015083.

PMID: 40052535 PMC: 11887030. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD015083.pub2.

Effectiveness of clinical healthcare interventions for enhancing the work participation of patients with various health conditions: a synthesis of systematic reviews.

Kluit L, Hoving J, Jamaludin F, van Bennekom C, Beumer A, de Boer A BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e094201.

PMID: 39979058 PMC: 11843017. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-094201.

Getting an outsider's perspective - sick-listed workers' experiences with early follow-up sessions in the return to work process: a qualitative interview study.

Standal M, Foldal V, Aasdahl L, Fors E, Solbjor M BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):609.

PMID: 38724997 PMC: 11080128. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-11007-x.

Toffoletto M, Ahumada J Rev Bras Med Trab. 2023; 20(4):659-669.

PMID: 37101450 PMC: 10124797. DOI: 10.47626/1679-4435-2022-740.

Non-pharmacological interventions to promote work participation in people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis from the EULAR taskforce on healthy and sustainable work participation.

Butink M, Webers C, Verstappen S, Falzon L, Betteridge N, Wiek D RMD Open. 2023; 9(1).

PMID: 36596655 PMC: 10098260. DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2022-002903.

References

Krause N, Frank J, Dasinger L, Sullivan T, Sinclair S . Determinants of duration of disability and return-to-work after work-related injury and illness: challenges for future research. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40(4):464-84. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.1116. View

Anema J, Steenstra I, Bongers P, de Vet H, Knol D, Loisel P . Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for subacute low back pain: graded activity or workplace intervention or both? A randomized controlled trial. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(3):291-8. DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000253604.90039.ad. View

Hansson T, Hansson E . The effects of common medical interventions on pain, back function, and work resumption in patients with chronic low back pain: A prospective 2-year cohort study in six countries. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001; 25(23):3055-64. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200012010-00013. View

Lauridsen H, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N . Danish version of the Oswestry disability index for patients with low back pain. Part 2: Sensitivity, specificity and clinically significant improvement in two low back pain populations. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(11):1717-28. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0128-6. View

Frank J, Sinclair S, Hogg-Johnson S, Shannon H, Bombardier C, Beaton D . Preventing disability from work-related low-back pain. New evidence gives new hope--if we can just get all the players onside. CMAJ. 1998; 158(12):1625-31. PMC: 1229415. View

Loisel P, Abenhaim L, Durand P, Esdaile J, Suissa S, Gosselin L . A population-based, randomized clinical trial on back pain management. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998; 22(24):2911-8. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199712150-00014. View

Labriola M, Lund T . Self-reported sickness absence as a risk marker of future disability pension. Prospective findings from the DWECS/DREAM study 1990-2004. Int J Med Sci. 2007; 4(3):153-8. PMC: 1885553. DOI: 10.7150/ijms.4.153. View

Gjesdal S, Lie R, Maeland J . Variations in the risk of disability pension in Norway 1970-99. A gender-specific age-period-cohort analysis. Scand J Public Health. 2004; 32(5):340-8. DOI: 10.1080/14034940410029487. View

Loisel P, Lemaire J, Poitras S, Durand M, Champagne F, Stock S . Cost-benefit and cost-effectiveness analysis of a disability prevention model for back pain management: a six year follow up study. Occup Environ Med. 2002; 59(12):807-15. PMC: 1763600. DOI: 10.1136/oem.59.12.807. View

10.

Kivimaki M, Forma P, Wikstrom J, Halmeenmaki T, Pentti J, Elovainio M . Sickness absence as a risk marker of future disability pension: the 10-town study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2004; 58(8):710-1. PMC: 1732858. DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.015842. View

11.

Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Brand R, Rudolph L . Alternative approaches for measuring duration of work disability after low back injury based on administrative workers' compensation data. Am J Ind Med. 1999; 35(6):604-18. DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0274(199906)35:6<604::aid-ajim8>3.0.co;2-t. View

12.

Steenstra I, Anema J, Van Tulder M, Bongers P, de Vet H, van Mechelen W . Economic evaluation of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick-leave due to low back pain. J Occup Rehabil. 2006; 16(4):557-78. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-006-9053-0. View

13.

Waddell G . Preventing incapacity in people with musculoskeletal disorders. Br Med Bull. 2006; 77-78:55-69. DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldl008. View

14.

Franche R, Krause N . Readiness for return to work following injury or illness: conceptualizing the interpersonal impact of health care, workplace, and insurance factors. J Occup Rehabil. 2002; 12(4):233-56. DOI: 10.1023/a:1020270407044. View

15.

Durand M, Loisel P, Hong Q, Charpentier N . Helping clinicians in work disability prevention: the work disability diagnosis interview. J Occup Rehabil. 2002; 12(3):191-204. DOI: 10.1023/a:1016846712499. View

16.

Steenstra I, Anema J, Bongers P, de Vet H, van Mechelen W . Cost effectiveness of a multi-stage return to work program for workers on sick leave due to low back pain, design of a population based controlled trial [ISRCTN60233560]. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003; 4:26. PMC: 317323. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-26. View

17.

Krause N, Dasinger L, Deegan L, Rudolph L, Brand R . Psychosocial job factors and return-to-work after compensated low back injury: a disability phase-specific analysis. Am J Ind Med. 2001; 40(4):374-92. DOI: 10.1002/ajim.1112. View

18.

Bandura A . Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977; 84(2):191-215. DOI: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. View

19.

Lund T, Kivimaki M, Labriola M, Villadsen E, Christensen K . Using administrative sickness absence data as a marker of future disability pension: the prospective DREAM study of Danish private sector employees. Occup Environ Med. 2007; 65(1):28-31. DOI: 10.1136/oem.2006.031393. View

20.

Lauridsen H, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N . Danish version of the Oswestry Disability Index for patients with low back pain. Part 1: Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity in two different populations. Eur Spine J. 2006; 15(11):1705-16. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-0117-9. View